nifty@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 年前Two sides of the same shit coinlemmy.worldimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down194
arrow-up1-21arrow-down1imageTwo sides of the same shit coinlemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square45fedilink
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·1 年前Thoughts on “On Authority” by Engels?
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前If you keep asking this way, they might
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 年前Low tier garbage rant about revolutionaries vs reformists. It’s the equivalent of a 19th century reddit rant complaining that people don’t want to bow down to authority until we’re magically all ready.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前How was it wrong? Use specific citations from the text
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前No. Theory is for idiots, time would be better spent on praxis than sitting around circle jerking about what we would do.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Authoritarianism is wrong yet you’re correct without any room for discussion?
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 年前Would you have a discussion in favour of racism or homophobia? I don’t engage JAQing off.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前Bigotry is wrong because innocent people are presumed to be evil or guilty based on a presupposition Give me the same line of reasoning against the text, just one, reference it directly
minus-squareComrade Spood@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前Engels was a bourgeoisie cunt that doesn’t understand what the word “authority” means.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前Can you elaborate on how he was wrong with specific citations from the text?
minus-squareComrade Spood@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Here’s a video full of them. I am done and fulfilled my end of this interaction. I will not fall victim to tankie sealioning. https://youtu.be/sexImJU4-Oo
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前Can you personally give me one example? Tell me roughly where it is in the text? Just one
Thoughts on “On Authority” by Engels?
deleted by creator
If you keep asking this way, they might
Low tier garbage rant about revolutionaries vs reformists.
It’s the equivalent of a 19th century reddit rant complaining that people don’t want to bow down to authority until we’re magically all ready.
How was it wrong? Use specific citations from the text
No.
Theory is for idiots, time would be better spent on praxis than sitting around circle jerking about what we would do.
Authoritarianism is wrong yet you’re correct without any room for discussion?
Would you have a discussion in favour of racism or homophobia?
I don’t engage JAQing off.
Bigotry is wrong because innocent people are presumed to be evil or guilty based on a presupposition
Give me the same line of reasoning against the text, just one, reference it directly
Engels was a bourgeoisie cunt that doesn’t understand what the word “authority” means.
Can you elaborate on how he was wrong with specific citations from the text?
Here’s a video full of them. I am done and fulfilled my end of this interaction. I will not fall victim to tankie sealioning.
https://youtu.be/sexImJU4-Oo
Can you personally give me one example? Tell me roughly where it is in the text? Just one