• kekmacska@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’m still mad at they killing xorg like it wasn’t bad and worked well, everybody could use it

      • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        xorg almost always worked for me. it had some quirks, but startx almost always solves it. And Xorg is supported by much more gui systems and applications, screen recording is also easy with it

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t say I’ve had the same experience. It was always buggy especially with multiple displays and touch screens. What pushed me to Wayland was the much better battery life.

          • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            ok i know that wayland is better for those but it is still not a valid reason to abolish xorg

              • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                i really hope so, because if they did, 65% of desktops/wms wpuld become inaccessible, that would really erode my trust with linux

                  • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    many desktops and wms were only designed for Xorg, as wayland wasn’t anywhere in that time