• jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    To piggyback on this, left-leaning echo chambers tend to underestimate the impact of turning on Israel amongst older voters, who tend to be more religious.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      From the other article covering the poll, Biden-Harris respondents were also asked how a change in policy would have affected their enthusiasm. 5% said it would make them less enthusiastic, 35% said more.

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Skimmed the article and I’m still confused. Why can’t people just link to the actual data?

    • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I definitely agree with that. We can argue about whether Harris would have benefited from saying she’d stop arms being sent to Israel, but to say it wouldn’t have hurt her as well is ignoring how much of the public supports Israel. There’s also a lot of people on the left who would have simultaneously said they’re glad she supports stopping arms sales to Israel and yet still find some other reason not to vote for her. The decision on which way for the campaign to go on the Palestinian genocide isn’t as easy or clear cut as many seem to think.