• Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not that anything is going to be done about it for the foreseeable future, with Captain Fuckwit in charge.

    • atempuser23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      California has done quite a bit on this. Local ordinances and state laws, and federal pressure. It’s not getting the help needed.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    writes a meteorologist and climate journalist

    This is barely one step removed from “claims” and “warns”. There’s no need to separate the source from the news in this headline except to distance the outlet from according this disaster to climate change.

    • anonymous111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There’s a link at the top of the site called “Climate crisis” and the Guardian is often accused of being too left wing.

    • atempuser23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      That doesn’t happen. This is a favorite talking point of farmers who live in a desert in the middle of California when the government doesn’t subsidize their farms as much as they want for more profits.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fucking farmer propaganda. The Newsom isn’t responsible for this bun fuckery. That’s entirely the talking point of the giant corporate farms paying for ads to sway the idiots. The reality is that farms pay pennies for multiple Olympic sized pools worth of water. A home in the state that doesn’t dump water all over dirt and do nothing for months has to pay a hundred, at least, each month. Farms need to pay their fair share.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        The reality is that farms pay pennies for multiple Olympic sized pools worth of water.

        My whole comment doing the math was inspired by me hearing people saying stuff like this, thinking it must be hyperbole…

        Your statement technically is, an olympic swimming pool is about 660k gallons…

        That would cost a farmer about $40.

        But it would cost an LA resident about $1850.

        Fucking bonkers.

        Like… I can see some level of subsidy, but not nearly 50x.

        • atempuser23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It’s only 50x of the water that residences are consuming is properly priced. Other places with much more water available pay more than Southern and central Californians pay.