• Cabrio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Who said it isn’t? But maybe, for the benefit of society as a whole, we should look at housing the ones we have before making more.

          • Cabrio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Cool, I just hope that coincides with the highest rates of adoption in the world.

            • angrystego@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Not everyone’s capable of loving other people’s kids but they can still be great parents to their own. Why not let them?

          • Cabrio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Sure if you’re illiterate I could see how you might think that’s what I said.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Better idea: raise all children in a creche until they’re 10, then have couples draft them like a fantasy football team.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I want to moneyball that bitch. Get twenty kids whose expected value is higher than their sale value. While you yuppies will be bankrupt buying one genius kid I will have twenty smart kids for the same price turning out code and content.

        • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Do you say the same thing to couples conceiving naturally; that natural conception should be second to adoption?

          Because if you don’t, you would be the one discriminating.

            • Noxy@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              When was the last time you told that to a hetero couple?

              • Cabrio@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                In my original comment. Because I don’t discriminate you’ll notice that I didn’t specify who should choose adoption, that means everyone should. I get that are you just being disingenuous because you’ve never seen someone with conviction of morals before, but please, try to catch up.

                  • Cabrio@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    My first comment was to whoever reads it. Why are you trying so hard to insinuate something? Are you just a cis hating biggot? Or just some wannabe white knighting pretender of an ally?

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Do you know how complicated and long an adoption process is? Sure, it would be awesome if people adopted kids instead of making more, but adoption will not be a viable option for most people until that mess is somved.