Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前stoplocklemmy.caimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down1192
arrow-up1423arrow-down1imagestoplocklemmy.caHellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square135fedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 年前 alot Do notional creatures count?
minus-squareMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 年前“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic. No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 年前 No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly. So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
minus-squareAurenkin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前Of course, they are very important!
Do notional creatures count?
“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic.
No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
There are exceptions.
Maybe for you
Pigs are delicious tho
Of course, they are very important!