• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Oh great, another item to waste my time checking when installing Firefox… Already takes near an hour to configure Firefox each time… Now have to watch out for the day they let the rest of that AI camel in the tent.

    *Installs LibreWolf, stays sane*

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is good enough for me. This means the Firefox code base will not get so integrated with AI features that forkers cannot remove them, and that was my primary concern.

  • calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Firefox has actually become less stable for me, which is crazy because it was stable for several years.

    It had gotten bloated and unstable when Chrome first came out, too.

    Why does Mozilla always trend toward mediocrity?

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The enshitification of Firefox may slow at times, but it’s been consistently getting worse since Firefox 2.0 over 2 decades ago.

      I wonder if it’s google telling Mozilla what to do, to keep getting their money.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I dunno that seems very compatible with the following that was said in the CEO statement.

      AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off.

      Also here is a link to the posts https://mastodon.social/@firefoxwebdevs/115740500373677782

      Also, the dev says the following and I think they have a point.

      I’m not asking for faith in our direction - the thing I love about the Firefox community is how open, honest, and technical it is.

      But I do ask that you don’t have the opposite of faith. Like, try not to be determined that we’re going to do the wrong thing here.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Something easily turned off is distinctly not opt in. They’re still lying to everyone.

        Earlier today I found a fucking AI feature automatically turned on… Those idiots need to get their shit straight and fast if they want to remain relevant.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        try not to be determined that we’re going to do the wrong thing here.

        There’s a lot Mozilla has done right, but there’s a lot they haven’t done right as well. These days, the cynical view has proven itself to be more reliable in general, so it’s hard not to apply it here as well.

        That being said, FF has supported AI chatbots for a while and I haven’t seen it come up once in my browser beyond when they said “this is a thing now”. But this has also been a good opportunity to explore alternatives, so I’m trying out Zen now (ff-based still).

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Can easily turn off” implies that it ships to you on.

        Honestly, asking us to assume that every action comes from a place of good will just makes me doubt them even more. You earn that kind of trust, you don’t ask for it; and if they don’t have it they should be asking hard questions about why.

        They are a company that used to be about independent choice but are effectively reliant on Google (a privacy nightmare) to be solvent, and they’re now putting their bets into being “a modern AI browser”. Nothing about that tells me I should just trust them.

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe but I although critical of some recent firefox actions think its possible given the og statement it is a clarification from a somewhat vague statement that was taken in the worst possible way by some and posted again and again often by people not even reading beyond the headline.

    • Alaknár@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They already said as much two or three months ago, but sure, believe that everybody is out to get you via forced AI.

  • ramenu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yawn. People have been saying “Screw MozIlla, I’m switching browsers now!”

    Nothing new. Just disable the feature like you do with telemetry lol.

    • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I switched to Waterfox immediately after they released the first news. Having to disable the AI stuff in about:config was already annoying enough, so I have no trust in whatever they claim anymore.

    • Jack@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Anyone know why LibreWolf isn’t in the default Debian repositories? I trust Debian - I’m not going to add a repository to get LibreWolf.

      Until it’s available from a default Debian repo, I’ll keep going thru my list of all the garbage I have to go switch off in Settings and about:config every time I install Firefox for someone.

  • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yeah. I’m still pissed off dev hours get wasted on this shit instead of, idk, HDR support? Surround sound audio?

  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Opt-in you say? How about RMB click with AI chatbot that you can disable by clicking “Disable AI bot” there? Wasn’t opt-in first. And, how is that in aboug:config .ml. list contains tons of entries set to True, rather than False? How in the fuck is it opt-in? It has been opt-out and in order to opt-out most of it, you would need an intermediate/advanced user. There was no toggle switch on a sidebar for normies to see and click. I call BS on this statement.

  • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol, lmao. Still deleting firefox, get fucked. Mozilla betrayed its users trust by choosing to follow this slop trend, and they’ll suffer the consequences.

    • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      & you’ll suffer the consequences of monopoly. Wait it out until LadyBird & Servo gets fully tested out

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Why should I wait it out with a company that’s betrayed the userbase’s trust when it comes to not only privacy, but by also implementing a feature that everyone KNOWS is harmful to both the planet and society as a whole.

        I’ve already moved browsers to one that respects its users enough to not push something that’s a quick cashgrab while it burns the planet and harvests our data.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    They say a switch will be built in. There is no switch yet. Which means the deluge of little popups about AI tab grouping and the “look at Perplexity” messages are not going away until these changes are actually released.

    • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      the killswitch is in about:config

      browser.ml.enable
      browser.ml.chat.enabled
      browser.ml.chat.menu
      browser.ml.chat.page
      browser.ml.chat.page.footerBadge
      browser.ml.chat.page.menuBadge
      browser.ml.linkPreview.enabled
      browser.ml.pageAssist.enabled
      browser.tabs.groups.smart.enabled
      browser.tabs.groups.smart.userEnabled
      extensions.ml.enabled
      browser.search.visualSearch.featureGate
      
      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s… Not really a switch. If somebody has to go to a secret place, get past a warning sign, and type in a half dozen secret commands… it sounds more like an espionage movie than the flipping of a switch.

        And people have already complained that some of those flags don’t affect newer ones, which Mozilla keeps adding. We might as well say Microsoft has a setting to turn off telemetry, never mind it’s also hidden and it also keeps getting switched back on.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        the killswitch is in about:config

        Ah yes, the easiest place to put a kill switch for the average user, as opposed to the complexity of a toggle in settings.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          People on Lemmy will hate to hear this but the average user wants AI integrations.

          That’s the main problem Firefox has. They are trying to appeal to a wide audience but their core users would never let them do anything that might do that. Then the core users sit there and wonder why Mozilla struggles and demand they work exclusively on the browser, an endeavor well known to not be profitable.

          The average user doesn’t give a shit about privacy either as evidenced by the state of the current Internet.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            First, citation needed on these people who want AI. People on LinkedIn will hate to hear this, but I don’t think the average user does.

            Second, I don’t understand your point. Do you actually believe the average user would feel compelled to switch to Firefox? Why? Instead, Mozilla is taking aim at their current users.

              • TehPers@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Search sucks, so they’re using LLMs?

                That really explains a lot about the current state of the world, to be honest.

              • MotoAsh@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                It sucks specifically because the megacorps want to make the AI look better than it is and because they want to keep people on search results pages…

                The shittyness is a feature to these vultures.

          • hanrahan@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            The average user doesn’t give a shit about privacy either as evidenced by the state of the current Internet.

            Indeed but 0% of them are using Firefox. That battles been lost

        • Ghoelian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well they should have done this when the first ai feature was introduced. Bit late now.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    then make it an extension.

    the fact that they’re entertaining ai at all is antithesis to mozilla’s mission of an open and environmentally friendly web free from profit.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hmm no

      Our mission is to ensure the Internet is a global public resource, open and accessible to all. An Internet that truly puts people first, where individuals can shape their own experience and are empowered, safe and independent.

      Thats the first paragraph from their mission statement here https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/mission/

      Doesn’t say anything about environmentally friendly. Also I think this part “where individuals can shape their own experience and are empowered, safe and independent.”, and their stance on AI in their browser and it being opt in make sense. Some people want to use it. Let them have a safe and private way to use it. Maybe Mozilla can show how a privacy respecting AI experience can be. Wouldn’t that still be a net good?

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree they should have put the switch first but also dev is messy. At least you can about:config it. And even then your data isn’t being sold out to anyone unless you use it.