Overtaxed and unpaid air traffic controllers are resigning “every day” due to stress from the government shutdown.

“Controllers are resigning every day now because of the prolonged nature of the shutdown,” Nick Daniels, president of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, told CNN.

“We hadn’t seen that before. And we’re also 400 controllers short—shorter than we were in the 2019 shutdown.”

Air traffic controllers are federal workers, which means they are part of the approximately 730,000 federal employees working without pay since the shutdown began on Oct. 1.

  • digredior@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    They should propose a bill that makes a lapse in appropriations trigger a CR so there’s no need for a shutdown.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Leadership believes they would be unable to cobble together enough votes to pass a budget if there wasn’t the threat of a shutdown to hang over the Representatives.

      Voters in the US tend to elect Representatives who are unwilling to compromise. Being obstructionist is rewarded with way better re-election chances than getting anything done. Voters want to see their candidate Stand Up To The Enemy, although they will accept passage of a Perfect Bill (as annointed by their media of choice). Passing a bill that is later deemed by their media of choice to have any small non-perfection gets them primaried and booted. So any candidate that doesn’t have extensive cover for passing a budget, that by its nature has to be a compromise, is replaced by a more obstructionist person.

      • TRBoom@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Continuing resolution. Basically if they can’t make a new budget the old one gets used.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              13 hours ago

              God, that sounds so nice. If you play these stupid games then you instantly end up on the chopping block. That fixes so many issues.

              • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                To be fair, our FPTP system does tend to create majority governments so this wouldn’t ever be an issue then as they can pass anything they want. We might be having an election though if this current minority government budget fails which it might.

                It’d be nice if we could move to proportional representation though as majority governments are almost always with well less than 50% of the vote and vote splitting fucks things up for center/ledt parties and let’s the conservatives win more because they consolidated into 1 party including all the extreme right whackjobs

            • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Good point. That definitely disrupts things to some extent – but the government doesn’t literally stop everything, AFAIK. Don’t departments still get their funding throughout, until the new government passes another budget?

              • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                No, you are right, things don’t just stop when that happens. I imagine funding could lapse if it was about to lapse, but just because there isn’t a budget passed yet doesn’t mean its immediately going to lapse.

                If we somehow had a budget fail, and for some reason took 6 months to have an election (would never happen), we might run into funding issues?

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Didn’t have that until a decade or so back? Thought I remembered we switched to this system so Republicans could reevaluate each time/hold everything hostage…

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Not really. You’re coming at it assuming the point of the system is to benefit the people. It is not., and the people who do benefit have a vested interest in ensuring things do not change.