• krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    Nothing says “I love the values of Star Trek” like shutting out anyone who thinks differently than you.

    • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think it’s important to consider other points of view thoughtfully, and question your base assumptions. Sometimes, constructive and argumentative discussion can help with that, assuming both parties are informed and respectful.

      Now, how often have you seen a disagreement in the comments section where both parties are informed, respectful, and working constructively to really understand the underlying issues?

      Sometimes, it’s best to just walk away, and blocklists are an excellent way to do so.

    • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      They had that whole Neutral Zone to keep the Romulan/.world/.ml/your-least-favorite-instance people at bay that didn’t share those lofty values. Those values also included letting civilizations be wiped out if they hadn’t made it to space fast enough.

      Sometimes you get the Tamarians, sometimes you get the Pakled, and sometimes you get the Borg.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s not at all what the Neutral Zone is for.

        It’s a negotiated border preventing all out physical war.

        The Romulans weren’t merely speaking ideas the Federation doesn’t want to hear.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think the analogy still applies. There are loads of people who I interact with who say things I don’t want to hear/profound disagree with. The block list includes people with whom it doesn’t feel viable to have a discussion with without things descending into flames.

    • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Life isn’t an endless grind or a thing to be beaten. If I think something’s annoying I’ll disappear it from my feed.

      I’m not obligated to waste my limited time on earth with frustrating and ultimately irrelevant strangers on the internet.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It certainly was all of that, until humanity “beat” nature.

        And not being obligated, doesn’t excuse.
        Covering your eyes, doesn’t help fix anything.

    • itgrrl :donor:@infosec.exchange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      @krooklochurm @milkisklim this says nothing about blocking people who think differently, just blocking people who are perpetually unhappy & spread that unhappiness everywhere…

      but more generally, people are absolutely entitled to drop their opinions and hot takes on social media – but they’re not entitled to demand or expect anyone’s ongoing attention if what they drop isn’t of interest (or is antithetical to their world-view) 💁‍♀️

      • milkisklim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Thanks for stepping in.

        For clarity I meant block instead of ban. I have no power to ban here or anywhere except from my feed.