That’s not how it works. Questions is how much more money they made by breaking this specific rules. If breaking the rules allowed to increase the profits by more then 3.5B then the fine is too small. If, for example, they made only $1B extra by breaking those rules then they effectively lost $2.5B and will stop breaking them.
googles net profit is 115 billion/year. So while 3.5 is inconvenient, I imagine google feels that its just the cost of doing business in the EU.
Sure you can be cynical about it, but you could also read beyond the headline
End self-preferencing practices — meaning it cannot give undue advantage to its own services.
Address conflicts of interest within its advertising supply chain.
Ensure fair competition by opening its ecosystem more effectively to rivals.
Oh no, how will they ever be able to afford the 4 bn fine if they don’t comply
wouldn’t they need to pay until it’s done? Looks like they found a way for them to pay a little bit of taxes
I believe it when I see it
That’s not how it works. Questions is how much more money they made by breaking this specific rules. If breaking the rules allowed to increase the profits by more then 3.5B then the fine is too small. If, for example, they made only $1B extra by breaking those rules then they effectively lost $2.5B and will stop breaking them.
googles EMEA division is 29% of profits. So figure about 30B profits.
Yes but if they stop breaking the rules those profit will not fall to $0.