orhtej2@eviltoast.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoSir?eviltoast.orgimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1527arrow-down110
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageSir?eviltoast.orgorhtej2@eviltoast.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 days agoFun fact there is literally no scientific backing to field sobriety tests. In fact there is a lot of scientific evidence proving they don’t work.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoThat’s interesting. Any recommended ones? If I had to guess its a lot easier to find flaws in something than it is to prove it 100% right. As I understand it, these tests are trying to get more data on if the driver is severely intoxicated or has major motor function issues.
minus-squareHugeNerd@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoOr fingerprints, or lie detectors…
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThere’s no scientific backing to fingerprints? Whaat
minus-squareHugeNerd@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoNo, there’s no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn’t change that we can identify them and match them. If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that’s all you need to know. Now lie detectors don’t work at all…
minus-squaregodfish@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoYeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoBecause it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.
minus-squareMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoYou can always take your chances on a blood test…
Fun fact there is literally no scientific backing to field sobriety tests. In fact there is a lot of scientific evidence proving they don’t work.
Pigs are liars?
Gasp.
That’s interesting. Any recommended ones? If I had to guess its a lot easier to find flaws in something than it is to prove it 100% right.
As I understand it, these tests are trying to get more data on if the driver is severely intoxicated or has major motor function issues.
Or fingerprints, or lie detectors…
There’s no scientific backing to fingerprints? Whaat
No, there’s no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn’t change that we can identify them and match them.
If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that’s all you need to know.
Now lie detectors don’t work at all…
Yeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.
Because it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.
You can always take your chances on a blood test…