I recently learned that voting on lemmy is not anonymous. Anyone can get information about who has upvoted and downvoted a post or comment.

In combination with your IP, this is a massive privacy (maybe even physical security) risk. Also, people can target you for your votes.

Sadly, this is something where I would prefer Reddit over Lemmy. Big tech scrapes data from both places anyways, at least Reddit is safe.

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I feel hat posts/comments are much more of a privacy exposure than any vote.
    If the OP wants private voting vs their post/comments then two account would be the solution to that - this is how it is done in the backend on piefed

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also if only voting is so bad, just don’t vote. Those votes are not used for anything but ranking in lists for others, you’ll not see any difference for yourself if you stop voting.

    • npdean@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Both of them are but when a person comments, they willingly put out their opinion in the public. Voting is meant to be anonymous (like irl).

      Also, votes have a massive amount as compared to comments. An average user might comment on 1 post for every 50 they vote on (a number I pulled out of my ass)

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Voting is meant to be anonymous

        You THINK it should be anonymous. I disagree so did Lemmy creators.

        • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          The Lemmy creators thought votes should be private, and didn’t respond meaningfully to people who tried to tell them that Lemmy votes are not private.

          If they’re currently retconning it as “Lemmy votes are not private and never were,” then that’s a step in the right direction I guess, but the fatal flaw was ever following the Reddit model where votes are “supposed” to be private for real. Because as you note it is impossible to do in an ActivityPub system. A lot of people when this was first being discussed, pre-lemvotes, were objecting strongly to the idea of making votes public, because they liked pretending they were private and just not paying any attention to the fact that they weren’t. I think mbin still refuses to display downvotes for this (stupid) reason.

          (Actually, Piefed did what I thought was a brilliant solution, creating new actors to send out votes with that were different from the comment actors, so that individual users could vote from Piefed and admins could check into it but the votes would not be trivial to associate with the users. IDK why they abandoned it but it seemed like a pretty clever way.)

        • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’d dare say lemmy creators wouldn’t mind private votes, they chose not to display voting counts to normal users after all, but that’s not how the ActivityPub protocol is built and honestly can’t be built if you want federated votes.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Voting is only seldom private IRL, only in very specific situations like in very important national elections.

        When you vote for what to get for lunch together or for who will be the head of your local football club or who will be the speaker in your school, most of them are public, similarly to Lemmy votes.