• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    It works by physically ramming the incoming drone, so it probably can knock things off course

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        I can’t pretend to be an expert on these things, but this is also a drone and it does not need to carry the weight of a large battery or an explosive payload. Surely it should be expected to at least match the performance of the incoming drone?

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          It’s much harder to hit something going 160 km/h than to hit something static with a munition going 160 km/h.

          And a thermobaric munition is like the miniaturised version of the MOAB that the US was busting bunkers with in Afghanistan.

          Point is, even if it hits the drone 100 m away, I don’t think that would be safe for the target. The primary defense is still jamming, but that is ineffective against wire-guided stuff.

          It’s not useless, but I don’t think Putin is safe either. It could also be a cope cage like thing, where the point is just the appearance of safety to calm Putin’s nerves and to discourage attackers.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            A 2kg thermobaric warhead for RShG-1/RPG-27 has a 10m lethal radius. For 100m you would need something far bigger.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Thanks for pointing it out though, I couldn’t find data on that warhead, I guess my guess was off by an order of magnitude.