• xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Normally, I would have advocated for the nationalization of Starlink and SpaceX as a matter of national and global security, but it’s not like the current American regime would do any better. I’m not going to be counting on them to investigate, let alone prosecute the affairs of this Russian junkie-stooge either.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Regardless of who would do better, the entirety of SpaceX and Starlink were paid for using American taxpayer’s money and government contracts. We already paid for it, we should own it.

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ohh, just wait till they privatize weather, mail, prison. hospitals…

        It’s gonna be too expensive to live on this planet for YOU.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          1 month ago

          Two of those are literally already privatised in America, and one more took some significant steps in that direction earlier this year.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            one more took some significant steps in that direction earlier this year.

            One? Last I checked, both weather and mail are both on their way to privatization.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Damn, mail too? That didn’t make international headlines the way shutting down the weather service did.

          • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            As rural hospitals shut down (due to lack of federal funding) they are being BOUGHT up by private corporations and LEASED back to the federal government (federal funding).

            It’s a LOT more money and it’s NOT going to the hospital.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Most prisons in the US are actually not privatized, although this is a bit of technicality as government-run prisons tend to have privatized a lot of their functions, like “catering” (lol) and guards etc.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      76
      ·
      1 month ago

      Brain dead take honestly. Nationalization doesn’t work out 11 times out of 10. Look at NASA, SpaceX ran circles around them with a tini tiny fraction of the funding.

      Nationalization does not mean it belongs to “us” it belongs to the government, an entity with motivations, incentives and desires different from “us” the people.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        1 month ago

        Could you elaborate on how SpaceX “ran circles around NASA”, seeing as how NASA basically pioneered every single piece of modern space technology, and all SpaceX is doing is fumbling to rearrange it like Legos that explode on the launch pad? Lol

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          NASA basically pioneered every single piece of modern space technology

          Hate to say it, but it was actually the Nazis who pioneered a lot of modern space technology. The US massively refined and improved it - often with the help of “rescued” Nazi scientists.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Think objectively about things, don’t just say things to echo the hivemind.

            Fuck off with the notion that everything that contradicts your opinion is the “hivemind.” It is supremely condescending and toxic to pretend you’re the only one capable of independent thought.

            • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Did I ever say or imply that everything that contradicts my opinion is of the hive mind? Because I don’t think I did. But this particular trope of trying to flatten any of the achievements of Musk’s companies simply because they are associated with him and calling for their nationalization is a tiresome talking point of the online “left” that simply parrots whatever everyone else “on their side” is supposed to think because it has leftie vibes. It’s as brain dead a take as any you would find on a Magatard community.

              And I do need to point out that nationalization is not inherently socialist or left wing at all.

          • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think you severely discount NASA’s achievements. I would wager the stagnation of NASA and the subsequent rise of SpaceX was largely due to a lack of funding for NASA and waning public interest and lack of leadership.

            I doubt the public would have tolerated the idea blowing up rockets until it worked as a good use of tax payer dollars. So did NASA fail us, or did the public fail NASA?

          • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            They keep giving contracts to SpaceX because that’s the way the budgets are mandated from congress. They have X amount of money to distribute. Everything goes to generally the lowest bidder, and because there are only a handful of options, they have to keep using one contractor to produce their parts because it’s even more expensive to keep switching.

            So drop the attitude. Usually the worst bidder gets the job, and it ends up costing more money after everything is said and done.

        • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Judging by the way they spelled “teeny,” I can’t help but wonder if they might also be familiar with the Cyrillic alphabet

        • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          El problema principal de estúpidos como tú es asumir que puedes inferir absolutamente nada de la persona detrás de un username en una plataforma total y absolutamente anónima. Cara de cabron huelebicho.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually am skeptical of nationalization. I think the free market is more efficient in most situations.

        But if you think SpaceX is running circles around NASA, well that’s so ridiculous that I’m starting to doubt myself.