• EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      2 天前

      Our core value is taking necessary services and pricing them like a luxury.

      Spread everything out really far, get rid of public transit, and, since everybody still needs a license to drive your expensive cars, make the driving test super easy to pass so almost everybody can drive. Boom, 1.2 passengers per car and nobody can actually drive them well.

      • Wilco@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 天前

        Yep. This person gets it. The auto and gasoline industry basically ruined the environment and our culture so a few select people can make a few $$$.

      • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 小时前

        I reeeeal American I just don’t want my tax dollars going to fund other people’s firefighting costs. Can we privatize that??

        Also a right to bear arms and own weapons is sacrosanct and very important to my people. Why can’t our people please finally be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Their kids need some too. Very important.

        Idiots.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 天前

      Our core value isn’t Car, it’s “individual freedom, especially at the cost or inconvenience of others”. It just so happens that Car aligns pretty well with that

      • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 天前

        So interesting to me that Americans think being dependent on a car is “freedom”. Individual freedom should be the freedom to get to where you need to go with viable options to walk, bike, train, bus, tram, or drive.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 天前

          I think you’re focusing too much on the “individual freedom” bit and missing the “at the cost or inconvenience of others” bit

        • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 天前

          We rarely have other viable options. Long before most of us were born, the U.S. built an infrastructure centered around cars, sidelining other forms of transportation.

          In America, owning a car is often the key to freedom of movement. So it’s no surprise people equate cars with freedom. Getting people to see how car dependency actually limits our freedom is like trying to wake someone from the Matrix.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 天前

          No one can make a profit on people walking, so I dont understand how your point makes any sense.

          edit: oh wait! footware and sports drink companies. OK, well, you’ve made some compelling points here. And we use small handed children to in America to make these shoes and sports drinks, right?

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 天前

        Yeah, you can’t drive like a dangerous asshole on your way to park your full size truck based SUV across two handicap spots if you don’t have a car in the first place!