The Minnesota governor said that the path to tyranny “is littered with people telling you you’re overreacting”

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz was testifying before Congress about his state’s handling of immigration when he learned Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., was forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security news conference Thursday.

The irony, he told the attendees of the Center for American Progress’ “Listening to Lead” event Friday, was in lawmakers grilling him and his colleagues, Govs. Kathy Hochul, D-N.Y. and JB Pritzker, D-Ill., over the “incredible crime of treating people like human beings” as FBI agents tackled a sitting senator to the ground and handcuffed him in Los Angeles.

“I am not prone to hyperbole. I am prone to, like, popping off a little bit. I know that,” Walz said, prefacing his argument that Americans are living in a “dangerous” time. “I believed all along we were marching towards authoritarianism, and people were telling me in December, ‘You know, you’re overreacting.’ And I said, “The road to authoritarianism is littered with people telling you you’re overreacting.”

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, we should strive for a candidate who is against all genocide. Let’s not compromise in advance.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You have a myopia that makes you incapable of looking past a single election. It is that myopia that has gotten us to this point here. Cycle after cycle of blind, zero-thought “blue no matter who” has made the democratic power-brokers completely disconnected from the base. You’re going to vote for them no matter what, so your opinions, thoughts, and desires are absolutely irrelevant. You do not matter to the political process at all.

            • rwtwm@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m not American (but we do get a lot of US Pol foisted on us), so forgive me if I’m missing something… I thought the US democratic party was basically everyone more left wing than Joe Manchin. There are ‘third parties’, but in general the broad church argument applies… Anyway aren’t USians able to actually pick the candidates that stand for those parties? So wouldn’t you use the generals to vote ‘against’ Republicans, but then use the primaries process to vote for the shape of D you wanted? Here that’s not an option, the party puts up candidates. But you have the ability to pressure the candidates even after they are elected. Might be a long shot, but is inherently less fatalistic than just giving up, or even (as seems disturbingly popular these days) calling for some form of civil war.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What a sad question when you remove the snark from it.

            Like honestly, the reality behind that is just sad.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they don’t care about brown people in the Middle East, they don’t care about you. Y’all’s inability to understand this got you Trump, so don’t repeat that mistake. Fascism abroad tends to be the preamble to fascism at home.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I struggle to see how proto-fascism now devolving into better-prepared fascism four years later would’ve been better than fascism now. And don’t give me the “it gives us time to resist” spiel because we both know that’s not how that ever worked; time to prepare only benefits the far right.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, stop following the neoliberals while they snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. I still remember the “progressive” reaction to Uncommitted and to calls for Biden to step down. If you’re not willing to coerce the DNC neoliberals into doing what you want, you’ll always be stuck doing what they want. And do you know what they want? Proto-fascism with rainbows and glitter.

                • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Coerce them. Sure. But almost any but the most backward dem would be better then Trump. You are just being asked to fill out a circle people have died to achieve less.

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Coerce them.

                    Great, now what kind of coercion do you support if you won’t even threaten to withhold your vote?

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            We got Trump because people like you thought supporting genocide was more important than winning the election