• Stabbitha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    If we read the article, we learn:

    Tucked inside the 1,200-page appendix to the White House’s budget request to Congress is a proposal to eliminate a grant program, funded by the Agriculture Department and administered by the Department of Justice, that provides domestic violence shelters with money to support survivors’ pets. Advocates say the program, known as PAWS, helps fill a critical gap despite its relatively small budget of $3 million

    So we see that it actually is a budget issue, nobody’s issuing a directive saying animals are banned at these shelters – the headline is misleading.

    We also see that the proposed budget cut is $3 million, which works out to almost a whopping 2¢ per taxpayer in the US.

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’d happily give 25 times that to help domestic abuse survivors and their pets. To put that princely sum in context: 50¢ could buy you a full-sized candy bar 30 years ago.

      • breecher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not the point. The Republicans are not doing this to save money. They are doing this for ideological reasons, namely that domestic violence is fine and there shouldn’t be any domestic violence shelters, because women should be subjugated to their husbands no matter what.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thanks for adding context and hard evidence to the discussion. Fuck them twice as much for doing it this way. It’s the same amount of sabotage and half the accountability.