I think you’re correct though. My guess is that it prioritized these searches because it has an exact match of singular Fs in them, like what they’ve typed. All male four/fivesome both haves Fs, and would probably be included if it includes more results, but they’re scored lower since there’s no lone Fs.
Notice the Bold F? These results are matching the search query ‘F’ that is already typed in. The all M options contain no ‘F’ and therefore don’t match the search string.
It’d kinda does - no M/M/M/M or M/M/M/M/M under Foursome and Fivesome, but there are F/F/F/F anf F/F/F/F/F. Would that be a bit too gay for them?
Even John F. Kennedy Assassination is there.
They filtered by F.
Edit: it should show up for foursome or fivesome. Could still be something just weird with the filtering though. Computers are weird magic machines.
But the tag “Foursome - M/M/M/M” very much contains the letter “F”. It’s why that first F is highlighted in the shown tags.
Oh, you are correct.
I think you’re correct though. My guess is that it prioritized these searches because it has an exact match of singular Fs in them, like what they’ve typed. All male four/fivesome both haves Fs, and would probably be included if it includes more results, but they’re scored lower since there’s no lone Fs.
I love computer magic. They do exactly what we tell them to. The problem is sometimes we’re not sure what it is we told them to do.
Notice the Bold F? These results are matching the search query ‘F’ that is already typed in. The all M options contain no ‘F’ and therefore don’t match the search string.
Those tags exist!
While this search doesn’t show it, M/M and multi-M pairings make what I would say is the majority of pairings on this site lol.