

Not sure what’s going on with that website–maybe it going down earlier messed things up? Here’s another (much easier to read) source which corroborates the original article: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h175
o/
Not sure what’s going on with that website–maybe it going down earlier messed things up? Here’s another (much easier to read) source which corroborates the original article: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h175
no, the vote was whether to ignore the impeachment, so “no” is the correct vote here
I think they intend to use one for voiced “th” and another for unvoiced, but they mess up a few times
yeah, I did check dates after, my irony circuits were just too fried when I first read it >.>
It looks like that’s indeed the case, and they’ve been around long enough that Handmaid’s probably wasn’t that well-known at the time. Still, the irony is off the charts… have they considered changing their logo to the traditional four-armed rotationally-symmetric sacred Buddhist symbol? >.>
naming your company fucking “Gilead” is some torment nexus-ass shit
I think there are plenty of channels that aren’t just using “cheap stock photos and/or blender animations”, and I can list some examples if you’d like. The first criterion is harder, though, because sci-com by its very nature isn’t going to be original research, so channels in this category tend to be more creative or opinion-based (i.e. multi-hour video essays).
That said, if I’m trying to really get at the gist of what you’re saying, I think you’re looking for shows that have a lot of original work and high production value?
Some random examples I can think of (I’m sure there’s plenty more):
(this is excluding so many great video essayists and artists since the original comment seems not to be referring to those)
Alternative link corroborating the original article: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h175
I’m not sure what’s going on with the first link, but that website is impossible to navigate for me.