• 2 Posts
  • 86 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle


  • I think there’s a really important distinction between “getting the same result” when that outcome is guaranteed and when it isn’t. Using a brick instead of a hammer to squash something will get you the same result every time. But with an LLM there’s no guarantee you’re going to get any specific outcome - will it hallucinate this time or not? - and so even if it gives you what you wanted this time, you have to account for the probability that existed it would not have done (and that you wouldn’t have known it let you down)










  • The idea of general intelligence (g) is that you’ve got some overall capacity that can be turned to any task. Human intelligence is probably much more like a big toolbox of skills, though, and I can’t see a version of computer “intelligence” that’s any different to that. I worry that people who get excited about AI are kidding themselves a bit as it isn’t going to be general - it’s going to be a toolbox at best: an LLM for writing, a totally different system for drawing, another for identifying birdsong, and and yet another for maths… And at that point you’ve not got some special interesting AGI - you’ve just reinvented the idea of apps