

because if we’ve learned one thing about Bezos and his pals is that they will be sooo happy to share any additional profits with their employees!


because if we’ve learned one thing about Bezos and his pals is that they will be sooo happy to share any additional profits with their employees!


Yes, that’s called a “marketing budget”


"but… Did you get the part where I am going to make trillions?
Ah wait… I’ll be selling you water to drink at premium rates! Nearly forgot that one.
What’s not to like? You humans are never happy. Can’t wait to replace you all with robots"


I don’t get it. Ok, so you are willing to do away with safety, legality and basic human decency to attract capitals to your country. Fair enough.
But then why not drugs? Drugs are almost as addictive as AI and create less damage to the environment. But above all, unlike AI, drugs are very profitable, even if they face a harsh regulatory environment.
Give it some thought, Milei. True, you like theatrics and the Sinaloa cartel are not as cartoonishly evil as Thiel (they are probably more standard business-like evil) but I’m sure you can work out some effective PR stunt with them too.


Now I don’t have to make life hard for my family all by myself.
I stopped drinking so much and gambling because we have no money, but our lives are still s##t thanks to President Trump.


I think they stopped telling workers anything a while back. They have LLMs for that. Exec messages have always been full of corporate lingo, canned legal language and artificial energy, so to be fair they have always been prime use cases for LLMs, but at least before you could still catch hints of their personality or a glimpse of humanity sometimes. Now that’s all gone. They have become at least 10x more efficient with layoffs though.


but even so, the total including the house is still very negative, here. It would be like… I don’t know, I can’t think of someone in their right mind who could bankrupt a casino 😜


well, not in the sense of “layoffs because AI can do those jobs”, but still AI-driven in the sense of “AI did most of the actual grunt work of laying off those people”.
If there is a repetitive and predictable activity that can be automated at this point it’s layoffs. Announcements and internal talking points are already clearly LLM-generated.


but it will absolutely learn a lot about everyone who wanted to talk about it


Might be useful for spam/robocalls. Not sure if having a personal AI use my phone to answer to another AI (and maybe accidentally giving up my personal data or signing my up for some scam service) is the right solution but if it worked really well I could potentially see the appeal


And he let Trump touch his tree trunk


I mean, that guy Farage does have a great track record of solid decision-making!


Metric or imperial byte?


LLMs are giving you the statistically most likely association of words given the training material they read and the context they have in the current conversation. Their answers are, in a way, mathematically correct by definition. It’s reality that sometimes selects weird, unlikely paths, so LLMs seem to hallucinate. But it’s reality that we have to fix! Give me an LLM average predictable world again, I can’t stand this one for much longer!
/s (but not conpletely…)


It’s not like Altman and Amodei telling everyone how AI is perennially 6 months away from taking everyone’s job is helping create that warm and fuzzy feeling for the technology either


I was personally shot once and the AI wearable I always have next to my heart stopped the bullet! Thanks AI!


Because we have to import most of our wind from China? I mean, where does wind come from, really?


Nothing, and I’m sorry if my remarks may have sounded offensive to people in the US. It’s just weird from a European perspective, where an approval between 30 and 40% would make most of our governments very happy.
A while back, I’ve read an article on the Obama-Keyes race for the Illinois senate race, saying that 25-ish% is the lowest approval rate you can ever get in the US based on the fact that Keyes (who lost in a landslide but still got about 25% of the votes against Obama) was:
a. black (so racism wasn’t a factor)
b. not from Illinois (so that wasn’t a factor either)
c. by all accounts, very unlikable and a complete lunatic
Sorry the piece I was referring to was much deeper but I can’t find it again, now… If they are right, this IS basically already rock bottom for Trump in terms of approval.


still… there would be 2 to 3 people out of ten looking at the wannabe Nobel Peace Prize guy waging wars, at the “jobs are coming back to America” guy sending unemployment rates up, at the “we’ll end inflation” guy causing $5 gas prices… should I go on? But still 3/10 people are looking at all this and think “eh, we’re doing fine!”
I am sure they will realize they are making a mistake and apologize 150 years from now.
I firmly believe that a woman who is in her heart a deeply racist and hateful person should be allowed to become a SBC pastor.