No. I mean you can get all philosophical and say that everything has value only because that’s a human concept, but thats not really something I would answer to.

Fiat has value because it’s enforced. Because we have institutions that enforce it and because all of our lives are intertwined with it. We buy food with it and we are paid with it. It’s everywhere. It doesn’t make it immune to manipulation and fraud and crime, but we can take legal action because law is also intertwined with the same system.

Crypto is , with a couple of exceptions, a really terrible casino.

Yes.

I think it’s an exaggeration of its crime utility. Normal money is king for crime.

I think most people don’t understand cryptocurrencies. On one side it’s all hyperbolic about being your own bank and financial freedom and new tech, on the other side it’s hyperbolic about how there is no underlying value, it’s all going to 0, scams, drugs, terrorism, money laundering,…

But the fact is that crypto does have an underlying value. It’s gambling. Gambling is a huge industry.

It’s not like he is merged with the essence of his show?

He could do a different show on the future. Many different shows. Plus I bet they parasite Dave would sliver to be on each and every one of them.

Ah, maybe you should watch though. I don’t think the article represents her views.

The article reads like someone wants clicks and they used a famous person to get them.

Did you watch the video?

Sabine is one of the most influential scientists today. You haven’t heard of her? She does amazing work and spreads knowledge, new science discoveries, new theories. I mean she did sell out a little bit in the last two years with the ads, but the videos are still brilliant.

She does criticize academia now and then, but I haven’t heard any critique from her that wasn’t completely justified. She does it for the field is theoretical physics, the field she knows.

The article is a hit piece and if you read it again you can easily recognize fallacies, like describing what other people say and putting that in the context of describing her, even though she has nothing to do with them.

Sabine is not perfect and for sure she has a grudge with what happened to her in academia. Maybe it was that personal experience that was maybe not referential to all of academia and she overstates the issues. But there is also another aspect to this. Now that she is famous, a lot of people try to tack on to her success, either with extreme flattery or extreme slander.

That’s pretty interesting!

It’s not mildly interesting 😐

Let’s go Ukraine!

We all hope best for the people of Iran. If this turned out surprisingly well, I still couldn’t give credit to the criminal US administration, as this is gambling with other people lives. I’d still be happy.

Unfortunately, it’s highly unlikely this will turn out well.

Even more than so many eu institutions haven’t even despite that.

They should be having more kids.

Go 🦩!

I’m a centrist, a down-to-earth person, I believe that the truth is always somewhere in the middle! 🤡

More than the third Reich?

Sir! Bravo!

Exactly, you have to be strategic and tactful. You don’t kick anyone out of anything, but you play along as far as you need to go.

And the US is not an enemy, just a very small part of the current administration is.

I watched some of the parts and I thought she did amazingly well, in MAGA terms. There is no way she could do it better with all the facts against her.

She doged questions, she did incoherent rants, interrupted people constantly, attacked the interviewers. It was despicable, everything MAGA like. I don’t see why they aren’t thrilled about her. She was trump on steroids.

It’s a pajama, who cares? The sandman?