

And Israel. They have an apocalyptic vision of the region and have no issue with genocide. They also have over a hundred nuclear weapons and never signed the Non Proliferation Treaty.


And Israel. They have an apocalyptic vision of the region and have no issue with genocide. They also have over a hundred nuclear weapons and never signed the Non Proliferation Treaty.
Youre right but in the interview he made out like he was able to blend in with his Arabic.
Also if he was a real whistleblower I’m sure he’d have had a car accident or tragic mugging gone wrong or suicide by now.
He said he’s fluent in Arabic and thats how he befriended and turned an al Qaeda guy in Pakistan but I heard him speak Arabic and its lousy and he would stand out as a foreigner a mile away.


Tried it. doesn’t work.


Why would the US undermine its own ceasefire by green lighting Israel to commit massacres against civilians in Lebanon?
Its makes more sense to see it as Israel wanting to dragg the US back into its war
Although, now that I think about it maybe the US did greenlight the massacres to embarrass Iran and show them to be weak and unable to respond to Zionist provocations. That makes sense as well.
I’m confused.


Performative stunt from an AIPAC puppet


Operation Epic Filing


deleted by creator
Zionists hate her because she supports justice for Palestinians rather than staying silent


I’ve read Schelling’s Strategy of Conflict so I have done some reading on this. Once again you are assuming players are always rational which is a simplistic assumption. The game doesn’t work if one side doesn’t care about iterative rounds, chooses to signal erratic behaviour or doesn’t understand the implications of their actions.
A good example is Nixon’s “madman theory” during the Vietnam conflict.
Trump is erratic and can’t be assumed to act rationally , so his use of a nuclear weapon would massively increase the chance that Russia would use one in response on the basis that the US is willing to kill the leaders of other countries in a sneak attack.
MAD is not set in stone and can break down in certain circumstances.


Calling out the Fourth Estate for its role in enforcing status quo narratives makes you paranoid, apparently.


They signed a ceasefire in Lebanon in November and violated it thousands of times, killing hundreds.
When Hezbollah finally responded the West blamed them for starting a war.


Yes Russia could launch a preemptive nuclear attack because Trump is a lunatic who kills and kidnaps leaders of other countries and sends drones (via Ukraine) to bomb Russian strategic sites
So Russia might think “kill them before they kill us” should Trump or Netanyahu use nukes against Iran.
MAD doesn’t work if one of the players is literally mad.
Got it now?


MAD assumes the other side is rational. Trump is a lunatic.


Get in the box for Israel. No wife for you.


Theres every reason to think the Russians would consider a nuclear trigger-happy US an existential threat to them and launch a pre emptive attack. After all, the US (through Ukraine) launched attacks on Russia’s strategic bombers and Putins nuclear bunker which would have been considered suicidal during the Cold War
If a nuclear weapon is used all bets are off.


Also the Russians would rightly be terrified they’d be next and could launch a pre emptive nuclear strike to decapitate the US and israel.
Why the downvotes?


America and Israel are the common enemies of humanity
Harris was just another AIPAC cutout.
Whoever you vote for in the US you get Netanyahu and his Zionist billionaire lobby machine.