Occurrence is too low. One day their will be a way to inject a boob growth drug, among other “enhancements”.
If that comes first or “bespoke babies” with gene editing comes first is a coin toss.
One day small boobs will be uncommon and I find that unfortunate.
Yeah, but that $250 is a bunch of food, some books, and tacos instead of one ok meal and some mimosas.
I said nice, not great, not fantastic, no premium, not luxurious.
It is nice. It is better than the typical land bastard special:
Mr. Chippy, feet first on PPV… If it were my call.
I don’t want the carbon footprint of that.
The clean joints above the showerhead and in the corner say otherwise.
It looks like a multi spray pattern model.
In America, the cheap ones we get look like this:
They can’t be legitimized, they are kiddie diddlers. They can be composted though.
His adult users already have, for MAPs.
The problem with this meme is the marble tile shower and nice showerhead.
Well, it is a platform for children… That does very little about pedos.
We should be fine so long as we don’t let the woke liberal leftists communists socialist colleges let spiders in under DEI with funding from Soros.
Only if we give them supplemental oxygen as they lack the ability to manufacture and have little to no engineering education.
Don’t worry, atmospheric oxygen is too low to make gigantic spiders possible.
All companies expressing any political meta is pandering.
Any adherence to a political meta isn’t a testament of their values, it is a testament of their customers’ values.
Companies want the money of their customers’ and they will say or do anything they think will keep making them money.
If you think any company supports DEI or LGBTQ issues genuinely, I have a bridge to sell you.
Their primary customer base is Republicans, your picketing means nothing.
Drive down a highway in any area with a decent population and it will be right off the interstate.
California spends over $50k per homeless person per year.
How has homelessness only grown?
Because of double dipping and lack of oversight.
One homeless person goes and gets welfare from one place and then another day goes elsewhere. Both places claim them for a period even though they may only actually be going to one place a day.
If California actually wanted to end homelessness, they could, but then the NGOs and administrators couldn’t profit off homelessness.
California is performative in altruisms and they will never accomplish anything of value on progressive values if they can’t use it to give money to wealthy people.
Yeah, because they are hebephiles and the pedoes defile the kid before they can.
Have you met humanity? Once it is introduced, it will take two generations before it is common.