data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdfb7/bdfb7864109083d8d622b69f135207adaffa09e3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62b7/c62b78f5f9a4d0e39d590e2c1cd67a8c2a498ef6" alt=""
Hahah no, there’s nobody driving the bus
Just some girl from Canada
Hahah no, there’s nobody driving the bus
No need for the \s. That is literally how they did this “study”. I’d be interested to see who it was that paid for this bullshit, wouldn’t be surprised to see the money trail leading back to commercial real estate.
The article boasts the headline front and center % productivity loss, as though this was some years long extensive study. The section of the report discussing these results is less than two paragraphs long. I’ve seen high school students put together a more detailed a well researched study.
What bothers me the most is that people will readily reference this article and spread this bullshit everywhere, with basically no one having read the study or put any critical thinking into this at all.
But he looks ever so polite, he must have his cheese!
A few have mentioned Hereditary already so I’ll give an honorable mention to Dark Skies with Keri Russel.
You know, I feel like lately every other article in that paper is an advertisement for Quarks