• 1 Post
  • 839 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • I really don’t care. But as far as i know. The landmass distortion on mercator is “corrected” by having boxes of “different sizes” across the map. Except that each box is actually respresenting the same km2

    I don’t know what image on the article is about.

    When looking into the eckert IV, this seems to be as accurate it gets

    Which i think is quite good. It’s a good compromise between shape and landmass, by NOT projecting it on a rectangle.

    Now compare this image, to the one in the article.

    It looks so stupid how they’re trying to overlay them while removing the context from both.


  • This may come as a shock to you. But it’s mathematically impossible to show the full surface of a sphere on a rectangle without distortion.

    The mercator projection has these smaller rectangles of “different sizes” across the map. There’s a reason for that. They show the distortion of size, in favour of highlighting shapes and angles of continents

    This “new” map will also have distortions. Though they will be far more difficult to show on the eckert IV projection, becase angles and shapes are now distorted, in favour of highlighting relative landmass.

    So what evidence or facts is it you’re talking about? Both are projections of a sphere onto a rectangle. There will always be distortion.






  • What is it you think you’re correcting? This is how it works. It’s happening right now. And has been happening for decades.

    goods ordered from Europe, to Canada, that only transits the US, is not affected by US tariffs. Because it’s not being imported to the US.

    Items can still arrive in a US port, be taken inland for further processing and distribution. And then whatever is supposed to go up to Canada goes up to Canada.

    the only time Foreign goods to Canada is subjected to US tariffs, is if a US company has taken ownership, and sell the product to Canada, rather than selling the transportation service










  • Funny story, here in Sweden, our speaker of the parliament was visiting a school to speak. Someone threw a “banana or part of a banana”. Bodyguards “aprehended” the boy until police arrived and the boy was interrogated at the police station.

    The speaker then started a criminal suit against the boy (who was 16) with the charge of disorderly conduct. The damage was noted as, “a stained shirt”.

    According to the speaker, incidents like this could cause politicians to not want to speak at schools (oh no… how will the children cope?)

    Anyway, people are calling him out as the clown he is. And i’d be very surprised if he gets to keep his post after our election (regardless of who wins)