• xistera@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is a big difference between expanding our knowledge and understanding of the universe around us and blowing up school children.

      The Artemis project has cost about $93 billion over 15 years. That’s about 5 weeks worth of spending in Iran.

      • MrSmith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, let me know how that joyride expanded your knowledge and understanding about the universe around you.

      • MrSmith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Only “Science” being done with that joy ride, is how to distract the public from the current events.

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    8 days ago

    All of this spending to: Check notes Kill children from countries you never knew existed, in military operations that are completely illegal.

      • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        A beatdown to the American economy sounds like a good strategy. Iran is proving that you can topple down a giant like the Us just by targeting key sectors

  • becausechemistry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well, it’s full of toxic fuels.

    The money is actually going to defense contractors, an obscene percentage of which goes to like one guy who probably hunts poor people for fun on the weekends.

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 days ago

      The money is actually going to

      It’s not about who receives the money, it’s about where that money would have went if it wasn’t put in the missile.

      • MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        With respect, it’s also about who receives the money.

        RTX makes the Tomahawk.

        In 2016, the stock was at 59. Now it’s at almost 200. A return of 338%. That’s about the same rate of return as the S&P 500 in the same timeframe. The difference being, the worst performing stocks in the S&P are regularly swapped out.

        So, yeah, these guys are pretty much a sure bet to make money.

    • MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      When you’re a billionaire, pretty much everyone else is a poor people… and, as an added bonus, you get to use Tomahawk missiles to hunt them.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s a myth that the US could fund it’s healthcare if it didn’t fund the military. This is because we already spend more on healthcare than the military already. By a lot.

    Medicare alone has a similar budget to the entire Pentagon!

    We’re not too cheep for healthcare, we’re getting ripped off!

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      most of its being subsidized by govt, via insurance companies its just that people never benefit from thsoe taxes paid, via through medical procedures, hospitals, medication that are from private corporations. besides they have low cost health insurance for service members, which is universal(tricare),

      medicaid/care is the govt already negotatited prices(which should be the norm) that keeps cost low. besides other countries also have private healthcare if the public version is too slow. you can have both.

    • fitgse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 days ago

      We spend more on health care per person and have worse outcomes than any country in the global north.

      That has a lot to do with privatizing all our medical facilities and wasting a ton of money through private insurance.

  • hobata@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    You can’t deny it, but the tomahawks are kind of made for schools in distant countries.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      They were made for fighting Russia like most of the major weapon systems, but haven’t had any opportunity to do so.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would be curious how much these missiles are marked up.

    It can’t actually cost like $14.9 million in materials and production costs and then $100k profit for the company can it?

    I wonder if it’s like $5million production cost and then $10million profit

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m pretty sure these are one of those “it costs $1 million to manufacture and then 14 million to guarantee they work and everything is documented.” things.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Funding at the federal level is never an either/or choice, it’s an active, explicit declaration of what the administration wants.

    Perpetuating this specious framing provides cover for malignant sociopaths.