• The_v@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1か月前

    So the tens of thousands of drones Iran has send to Russia to be used to attack Ukraine was totally different.

  • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1か月前

    Not a wise strategic move in my opinion. Ukraine has very little to gain by providing Israel with drones.

    • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1か月前

      That depends on what we get in return. If we can get more anti-missile defences, that’s worth it. Of course, nobody’s sending Ukrainian personnel and interceptors for free.

          • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1か月前

            Right. Coming back to the original point though, if there are multiple countries to do this transaction with, there are important strategic reasons to avoid doing it with Israel and to go with those other countries instead.

            • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1か月前

              So far this article is the only place I’ve seen that mentioned Israel in the list, and that’s from a thirdhand accusation. So, coming back to the original point, nothing is confirmed yet

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1か月前

    ML meanwhile insists that Ukraine shot first and that participation in sanctions makes terror bombing Ukrainian civilians somehow justified

    edit: lol they banned me

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1か月前

    IF Ukraine sends only defensive-drones, THEN Iran may be pressured into walking that back.

    IF not, THEN not.

    _ /\ _