• SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I would like to someday use AI to remaster Stars!, Magic Carpet, and Judgment Rites. However, it won’t be through co-pilot, because I fundamentally don’t trust Microsoft.

    In any case, I think genuine “hands off” development from an AI would be at least a decade off. Partially just for it to have the ability, but also for local hardware to support it. (I only use local AI, but a 100b like GLM is slow as heck on my gaming rig.)

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s great at bullshitting that it did what you wanted, even if it obviously didn’t, which I guess is what counts for results at Microsoft.

    It would be much better if they treated it as the slightly better (yeah, I said it) auto complete that it is instead of the beginning of fucking sky net – which was supposed to be a bad thing anyway, remember?

    But that wouldn’t move the needle on all of the share prices, so instead we have to pretend it can do people’s jobs when it fucking obviously cannot.

    So, instead they keep pushing this AI (auto-complete insanity), and keep burning more and more cash. Imagine if we just put a portion of these billions (approaching trillions) into anything that could actually help anyone. Or don’t, because it’s pretty fucking depressing to think about.

  • llama@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Actually it won’t be finishing anything because code is disposable now and nobody cares what trivial app somebody can churn out

  • Lyrac@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Big over-promise. We’re heavily incentived to use an AI coding agent at work. I try to be optimistic and treat it like a tool to help me do things I already know how to do but a little bit faster. It takes multiple iterations of “no, this still isn’t working” to get something that I can touch up and push for review. The idea that I can prompt it and then step away for ten minutes to make coffee and return to an app is ludicrous.

    Maybe one day that will be possible. Then I’ll find a new job I guess

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think I keep having the same deja vu for at least three years now. That, or these execs are fucking liars telling the same lie for the past 3 years.

  • lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Writing code is the reward for doing the thinking. If the LLM does it then software engineering is no fun.

    It’s like painting - once you’ve finally finished the prep, which is 90% of the effort, actually getting to paint is the reward

    • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What a great way to frame it, I love this! I typically spend something like 60-80% of time available for a given task thinking through approaches and trade-offs, etc. Usually there comes a point when the way forward becomes clear, even obvious.

      After that? Bliss. I’m snapping together a LEGO set I designed, composed of pieces I picked (maybe made one or two new ones!), and luxuriating in how it all feels, when put together.

      • WaitThisIsntReddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        A couple agent iterations will compile. Definitely won’t do what you wanted though, and if it does it will be the dumbest way possible.

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah you can definitely bully AI into giving you some thing that will run if you yell at it long enough. I don’t have that kind of patience

          Edit: typically I see it just silently dump errors to /dev/null if you complain about it not working lol

          • Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            And people say that AI isn’t humanlike. That’s peak human behavior right there, having to bother someone out of procrastination mode.

            The edit makes it even better, swiping things under the rug? Hell yeah!

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    What they forget to mention is that you then spend the rest of the week to fix the bugs it introduced and to explain why your code deleted the production database…

  • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean it gets there in the end but it’s often three of four prompts before it provides working code for a relatively simple powershell script. Can’t imagine that it scales to complex code that well at the moment, but then again I’m not a coder.

  • YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ah get outta here! Next time they’ll say that co pilot also chooses my furry porn and controls my buttplug while it codes for me.