• Eldritch@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 天前

    As we know it? It already has several times. How many of you out there are browsing the web using Gofer? The centralized oligarchcentric web that we know today needs to die and great new things are coming along to take its place. Returned to more sustainable collaborative websites and services. Like the fediverse.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      The only solace I take in the enshittification of the web and the resulting rise in prices, is that we might see (be forced into) a return to the small web and an escape from the stranglehold that big tech and social media has had on us for the last 15 years.

      If we’re lucky, the late-stage capitalism effect of ruining companies long term futures for short term gains might happen to entire industries instead of companies.

      • gary@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 天前

        I see a lot of potential for it to push people back to the small web too. Lots of people becoming interested in personal blogs lately, decentralized social media, the whole indie web movement, etc.

        • mesa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 天前

          Just started mine! In plain html/txt. Just for fun. Eventually get rss up and running.

          • gary@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 天前

            Hell yeah! I’ve been blogging for a couple years but I just use Micro.blog. I’d like to switch to something completely self hosted one of these days though.

            • mesa@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 天前

              nice! I took a look at all the options…

              and decided that its all too much. wordpress get hacked daily. writefreely wouldn’t install. And some of the other centralized services kinda suck. So im back to old: nginx with a director filled with txt files haha.

              Ill publish as time goes on and by interest. Ill take a look at micro.blog too. But im thinking I might create a neocities at some point just for the fun of it.

              • gary@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 天前

                Neocities isn’t a bad option tbh. I haven’t used it in a minute but if you’re thinking about neocities I really really liked bearblog.dev too!

            • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 天前

              I just spun up my own Ghost blog, being self-hosted and interacts with the Fediverse. Plus it’s pretty without me needing to know how.

              • gary@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 天前

                I’ve been really curious about Ghost lately! I set it up in a container on pikapods not too long ago but I ended up staying on Micro.blog. Something I really liked that I had no idea about beforehand was that they have their own little Discover feed over there right? It felt too serious for me when I mostly run an old school link/microblog kinda blog and it seems SO optimized for mailing lists and subscribers

                • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 天前

                  Yeah, there is a lot of focus on getting your site out, but I just ignore all that part. I just wanted a nice place to self-host my travels without having to think much about it and it seems to fit that bill. But yeah, there is a place to discover other feeds and to comment on other people’s posts from the Fediverse and what not.

          • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 天前

            I got 1gbps internet (symmetrical) and a raspberry pi cluster… running my own Wordpress never made more sense… AND that botch should scale!

              • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 小时前

                Yes, My home network setup is a bit complicated but I am using Pfsense so I have things on separate vlans with internal firewall rules to reduce risks.

                All traffic in on port 443 is routed from Cloudflare to an NginX reverse proxy which decides how to connect back into my network for things

                Years ago I would just run a server on the network with 443, 80 and 22 exposed directly to the world and never had any major issues. (Other than the normal automated attacks trying to gain shell access over SSH)

                • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 小时前

                  Gotcha, vlan setup sounds like the best possible way to do it, I don’t trust my security skills at all, 22 with fail2ban is about as far as I trust myself!

                  The hammering 22 gets is astonishing though.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 天前

        Definitely. The conditions that created this version of the web have been gone for some time now. We’ve gone from connections that were temporarily and required hours to download a few minutes of postage stamp sized video. To always on connections capable of streaming multiple HD streams faster than real time in both directions.

        For my part I’m also looking in to purchasing and trying to set up a small Adhoc mesh Halow network and running a few services on it for myself and any others in the neighborhood that are interested. A small, free (after the hardware) anarchist wireless network. 16mbps can do a lot with simple services, etc.Plus, if a number of people in the area decided to adopt and contribute more nodes to the mesh, you could go faster still.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 天前

          That sounds like a fantastic way to go. You might also look at meshtastic.

          It’s a much different use case, being for text messaging and stuff like that only. But, while it may be low bandwidth, it’s still incredibly interesting.

          • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 天前

            I jumped on Meshtastic but found it got too congested with noise in a medium-sized city making it difficult to get much out there. Switched to Meshcore and have had a much better time communicating. Seattle’s full on made it equivalent to SMS, which makes me jealous. But YMMV 🤷🏼‍♂️

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 天前

              What preset were you using at the time? I know that longfast is not the best preset for larger networks that have a lot of users.

              Personally, open source matters to me much more than the speed or congestion or whatever, which is why I chose meshtastic. Because the mesh core, foam applications are not open source.

              Until there is an open source version, I absolutely refuse to touch it. I know that the underlying software is open source, but without having open source interfaces, I’m still refusing to touch it.

          • mesa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 天前

            https://reticulum.network/ is also pretty good for small info packets. Does a LOT more than meshtastic…but its VERY difficult to set up. Or at least it was for me.

            Its a pipe dream but having small internet without a major ISP would be fantastic. But it will never happen as it is. Friends are thinking of creating a meshnet though just for fun.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 天前

            Yes, the bandwidth would be the damper there. It’s great for transmitting just a little bit of data, long distances. But for any sort of bigger data we transmit regularly on phones and desktop. It becomes unfeasible, even low resolution images.It definitely has a range benefit, though that’s for sure.I think fellow Missourian Jeff Geerling had a video out a while back where he talked about using it to contact people below his flight on the way to open sauce.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 天前

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mother_of_All_Demos

      The 90-minute live demonstration featured the introduction of a complete computer hardware and software system called the oN-Line System or, more commonly, NLS, which demonstrated for the first time many of the fundamental elements of modern personal computing, including windows, hypertext, graphics, efficient navigation and command input, video conferencing, the computer mouse, word processing, dynamic file linking, revision control, and a collaborative real-time editor.

      In 1968

    • tal@olio.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      How many of you out there are browsing the web using Gofer?

      Gopher predated the Web.

      I do agree that there have been pretty major changes in the way websites worked, though. I’m not hand-coding pages using a very light, Markdown-like syntax with <em></em>, <a href=""></a>, and <h1></h1> anymore, for example.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 天前

        That depends on how you define the web. If you only call the web the web when it was named the web and not what it was before it was named the web. Then yes you’re correct that was before the web. The question is, is that a semantic or significant difference? ARPANET was still a web of interconnected systems. For an old goober like myself.who was using FidoNet net back in the mid 80s. And the actual internet in the late 80s, early 90s. I definitely remember Gophering on the Internet. Plenty of places still maintained gopher directories till the mid 90s.

        • tal@olio.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 天前

          That depends on how you define the web

          Wikipedia:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gopher_(protocol)

          The Gopher protocol (/ˈɡoʊfər/ ⓘ) is a communication protocol designed for distributing, searching, and retrieving documents in Internet Protocol networks. The design of the Gopher protocol and user interface is menu-driven, and presented an alternative to the World Wide Web in its early stages, but ultimately fell into disfavor, yielding to Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP). The Gopher ecosystem is often regarded as the effective predecessor of the World Wide Web.[1]

          gopher.floodgap.com is one of the last running Gopher servers, was the one that I usually used as a starting point when firing up a gopher client. It has a Web gateway up:

          https://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/

          Gopher is a well-known information access protocol that predates the World Wide Web, developed at the University of Minnesota during the early 1990s. What is Gopher? (Gopher-hosted, via the Public Proxy)

          This proxy is for Gopher resources only – using it to access websites won’t work and is logged!

          • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 小时前

            This has been mangled up by history. The important parts of the World Wide Web are having hypertext (basically links inside the document to other documents) and being networked (those links can take you to a completely different server). Apple’s Hypercard had hypertext, but it wasn’t networked. Usenet was networked, but had no hypertext.

            This is laid out in Tim Berners-Lee’s original 1989 proposal for the web while he was at CERN:

            https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html

            Gopher has all the qualities he was talking about. Gopher was a different kind of World Wide Web. We decided against that particular route, and for mostly good reasons, IMO.

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 小时前

          Meh.

          I converted my blog from WordPress to a static site generator using Gemini’s version of Markdown as the base format, and then hosted both HTTP and Gemini versions.

          I later took down the Gemini version. The web site remains as static HTML driven by (a variation of) Markdown. No cookies, no JS, limited CSS. Even took out some old YouTube <iframe> tags and converted them to straight links to videos. Doing it this way does everything anyone would want out of Gemini without having to use a specialized client.

          We should be promoting some kind of browser extension that flags a site as having no cookies and no JS.

      • tal@olio.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        I questioned Reddit doing so, and now we’ve got it on the Threadiverse. There are privacy issues unless your home instance is proxying images for you.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      I sympathize, but Gopher is designed against hypertext (inline links in text). It is impossible to have e.g. Wikipedia transmitted over Gopher.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 天前

        I would argue that’s not quite correct. You can absolutely transfer HTML files over gopher, but you’re not going to be viewing it in the gopher program.It was very much designed to be what most people would be more familiar with in concept as an FTP server today, almost. Pretty much all you could view in app were plain text files. and no links between. Everything else was a directory of files to be downloaded.

        Gemini is definitely a bit of an inbetween. It does allow for linking between documents, but otherwise keeps everything simple and small, much like Gopher did.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 天前

          I much prefer browsing the web instead of 2-clicking within each FTP path. (If you built a client to 2-click that for you then that’s just the HTTP web with extra steps.)

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 天前

    Long ago, when I first got on the Internet, the big social media forum was Usenet. It was a distributed network of instances where users would have an account on a particular instance, where they could subscribe to “newsgroups” dedicated to particular topics. Their instance would broadcast their posts to a newsgroup to all the other instances that were following that newsgroup, so everyone could interact even if they were on different instances.

    Then the World Wide Web grew, and centralized sites like Digg and Reddit appeared that handled the same sort of social media. Usenet faded. It’s still around, I suppose, though these days last I checked it’s largely a mechanism for distributing pirated files.

    Someday those centralized sites might also fade. Who knows, maybe a decentralized system like Usenet might grow again to replace it?

    The wheel turns.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 天前

      So Usenet was the first fedi site? Reassuring that the concept predates the current paradigm and still has legs, however niche it is atm.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 小时前

        Sort of. It predated the web, so calling it a “site” is wrong. Just like you can have an email application that’s completely separate from your web browser, you can have a Usenet client that’s also its own thing. Of course, people made web-based clients as time went on.

        Your ISP ran a Usenet server that connected to other Usenet servers. The biggest problem with this system was that your ISP would automatically delete posts past a certain age. Following old threads was a pain.

        Google Groups started as a Usenet archive where messages were kept forever. Google bought them and turned it into what it is now.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 小时前

        No, it was every service replicating all posts in groups it served.

        Like FTP mirrors of FOSS software, there are plenty of mirrors of Debian, for example. Except far bigger traffic.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 天前

        I mean, sort of? It was decentralized because that was just the nature of the early net, rather than a conscious choice to avoid governments and corporations censoring you. They simply didn’t have anything like the net we have today.

        • Broadfern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 天前

          That’s fair. I forgot briefly that fediverse has that political side lol but meant more the technology of “broadcasting” and inter-site communications. Seems a better comparison than email at least.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 天前

            Yeah, Usenet was structured that way more for practical reasons than political ones. Local users were truly local, as in you usually connected to a server that was geographically close to you. Often it was on the same university campus you were on. The long-distance connections between servers didn’t have the bandwidth for everyone to just be freely hopping around browsing whatever they wanted whenever they wanted, at least not at first, so mirroring the content was a better approach. It also made things much more reliable, the servers didn’t need 100% uptime.

            Usenet was a lot more “trusting” in its structure. The newsgroups didn’t have moderators per se, and they weren’t hosted by specific instances; they were more just a “tag” you could add to a post to let people filter which subjects they were interested in seeing. There was a globally agreed upon list of newsgroups and a distributed system for creating new ones, but it was all pretty informal. Wouldn’t work well in the current Internet, it’d get spammed to death in seconds. But on the surface level it really felt a lot like the modern Fediverse does, with subject-specific groups and threaded discussions and such.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    I get what the video is saying, but I don’t see this as a bad thing. We moved on from many of those services because we found better ways to do things, or at least ways that we liked more. And when we move on from the services we use now, it’ll be because we once again found something we liked better.

    The internet has died several times, but each time it came back in some new way that had adapted to the new ideas and ways we came up with on how to interact with each other. I’m sure when it dies next, we’ll replace it with something that better fits our changing wants and needs.

    And hopefully, when that time comes, it’s something much more decentralized and resilient against governments and corporations meddling and censoring us.

  • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 天前

    Aside: what’s the gist of this channel? I’m not really familiar with it but the last few things I’ve seen of it appear to be two brothers communicating to each other via vlogs?

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 小时前

      Pretty much, vlogs as if it were two people communicating back and forth via message. Hank is a really smart dude and also works on the SciShow channel, and his videos are generally pretty good/insightful IMO.

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 天前

      The Green brothers are interesting and thoughtful. They try to be an overall positive influence on the internet, even aside from their vlogbrothers thing.