This is what they would see if I was being targeted.
Surprised the UK age verification selfies haven’t been used to extort people yet. It’d be so easy (and is such an obvious reason why the law is bullshit).
SecurAge🛡️
“Log in with Google to verify your age.”“Sorry, we weren’t able to verify you using your Google Account. Please take a selfie for verification.”
“Now give us £1000, or we’ll send your picture and details of the porn you were trying to access to everyone in your contacts.”
don’t stream, download your porn from usenet like a civilised person
i get how usenet is better than streaming from a popup filled website, but i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
qbittorrent has built-in search as wellPopups? In 2025?
You don’t understand the difference between Usenet and torrents.
i haven’t used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i’m wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
It’s better because it basically has everything that torrent sites have, since the same groups upload everything to both, but it’s all done over SSL encrypted connections so your ISP can’t see what you’re downloading, so you don’t need a VPN and you are downloading directly from servers so it’s much faster and you don’t have to worry about the number of seeders, nor do you have to seed yourself. You have many different providers you can sign up to, and many different indexers to help find what you are looking for. It also can download parts of the same content from different sources and combine them to make a whole.
Once you’ve tried it, torrenting feels so amateur and insecure and outdated. Ideally you just set up both, which is what I have done with transmission running in a docker container with a built in VPN, but the torrents are the “last resort” when the content I want can’t be found on Usenet - which is very rarely.
Doesn’t this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it’s distributed and more resilient?
It’s not like it’s just some server in some persons house. They’re hosted by companies on server farms that have guaranteed uptime figures and most have 2000+ day retention of data. I’ve been using it for 10+ years and have never had any server failure type issues.
I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it’s hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers?
It’s also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it’d be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.
And no, torrenting isn’t outdated and isn’t amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.
Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier.
Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett.
I haven’t touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin’, then it transfers the complete files to another folder.
But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself?
OK, I’ll try it.
It’s also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it’d be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.
It’s really not. You pretty much need to just put in some api keys for your indexer, downloader, and provider, and away you go.
In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.
What downsides are you talking about in regards to downloading content from usenet?
Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia …).
You could but you know there is nsfw content right here on Lemmy
In my day the popular kids would share it over bluetooth.
Bluetooth? I got mine from a dial-up BBS via a 1200 baud modem.
empornium FTW!
I haven’t touched a webcam in years but I just touched myself 5 minutes ago
Lots of folks I’d imagine use their phones, which has cameras on both sides
Why the hell can’t I get a phone without a front camera? I never use it and it creates an annoying hole in my screen
Let them watch. Bwahahaha
That only works if you’re ashamed about rubbing one out.
Seriously, go ahead and try to give someone that shit. No one would be surprised I watch porn and I don’t do it in any sort of interesting way. I’m guessing no one would even want to watch it.
Worst voyeur video ever.
I’ll reply the same way I do to the scam attempts: Do it bitch.
Also if you are sending my family a copy, send it to my email address too. Thanks.
“Reaction videos” are already too common.
Is this a new thing? I remember hearing about this like a decade ago
hardware camera disablers.
This, thank you Framework! Mic too!
also called two year old post it note that has never been taken off
Go on
tape
These days it’s pretty weak blackmail shit. A little AI doctoring can create the same videos… So even if it’s possible, that doesn’t mean it’s plausible, and nobody cares what you do in your bedroom by yourself.
A friend of mine had this happen to him and he just told them to release it, nothing happened. He was willing to take the embarrassment if it did though is the crucial thing.
Why am I not surprised that this shit’s freely available on GitHub.
well i hope they like ineffable husbands
