Gaza aid stuck as Egypt says Israel not cooperating
www.reuters.com
Egypt said on Monday that Israel was not cooperating with delivery of aid into Gaza and evacuations of foreign passport holders via the only entry it does not wholly control, leaving hundreds of tonnes of supplies stuck.
      • TheGreatFox@lemm.eeEnglish
        609·
        1 year ago

        their new homes

        You mean the land that they illegally stole from Palestinian civilians, butchering anyone that refused to be made homeless?

          • TheGreatFox@lemm.eeEnglish
            16·
            1 year ago

            The only claim I recognize to the land currently being fought over is that of The Kingdom of Jerusalem as proclaimed in 1099 by Godfrey of Bouillon. The title has passed to the current rightful claimant of the Kingdom, His Majesty Felipe VI, King of Spain. I demand the restoration of the rightful Catholic monarch as the blessings of the One True Church is the only way to bring peace to the Holy Land. We’ve tried allowing the Hebrew and the Saracen to govern the territory and we’ve witnessed nothing but chaos as they squabble over their false doctrines and heresies, shedding their unholy blood on the land that rightfully belongs to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, to be administered by his divinely appointed representative, Felipe VI.

          • filister@lemmy.worldEnglish
            162·
            1 year ago

            Isn’t this the same argument Israel is using? That this land historically belonged to them, and they are entitled to it and have all the rights to evict Palestinians, because you know, history.

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.deEnglish
              211·
              1 year ago

              They don’t evict Palestinians, though. While on the other hand many Palestinians want to kill or exile all Jews from the area (which is the majority of Israelis).

                • Clent@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  14·
                  1 year ago

                  A very quick internet search proves otherwise.

                  I am not sure you should speak on this topic if you’re this ill informed.

  • Mammal@lemmy.worldEnglish
    479·
    1 year ago

    The prisoners have to be punished brutally for daring to retaliate against their conditions.

      • Mammal@lemmy.worldEnglish
        302·
        1 year ago

        You need to be more specific. Are you talking about the civilians inside the prison? Or the civilians outside the prison?

      • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.worldEnglish
        223·
        1 year ago

        I assume you’re trying to construe these kinds of statements as support or justification for Hamas’ attack. That’s mostly not the case. I don’t think many people condone it. I know I find it unjustifiable. However I think the reasons why it happened are explainable and at least somewhat understandable.

        The conditions the Palestinians have been driven to , largely by the Israeli military/government and the illegal settlers have created a situation where they feel there aren’t many other options. It doesn’t make the attacks any less horrific. It doesn’t make the attacks right. It doesn’t make them justified. But it does make them practically inevitable.

  • Endorkend@kbin.social
    392·
    1 year ago

    Israel is going to slow down cooperating as long as they can, so there’s as much death as possible, while still being able to say they allowed them to live.

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      19·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, they will ultimately cooperate as the USA and Europe increasingly go “hey guys, please no genocide”, but as slow and as little as they can.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldEnglish
        10·
        1 year ago

        Reading between the lies, it looks like Biden is trying to really hammer home the message that Hamas is different from Palestinian civilians and that the latter should be protected. Abbas issued a condemnation of Hamas after Biden spoke with him, even though initially Abbas excused the attack.

        We’ll have to see how successful it is. Judging from who they’re asking to stay quiet on this, I think Biden and only the highest ranking officials are trying to back channel here.

        • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          1 year ago

          The only thing I can think of is that some of the more moderate Arab states put some pressure on the Biden administration. Because initially the posture seemed more like they were going to be 100% on board with whatever – even directing the State Department to not talk about things like ceasefires, de-escalation, and the normal stuff that the State Department should always be talking about. And it really seems like that has changed a bit since the end of last week/this weekend after Blinken was meeting with some of them.

          • breakfastmtn@lemmy.caEnglish
            3·
            1 year ago

            The US has been pressuring for restraint behind closed doors while offering unconditional support in public from the start. Honestly, they haven’t even seemed to be trying too hard to keep it a secret as details of closed door talks have been leaked almost in real-time. Democrats don’t like Netanyahu, who’s aligned himself ever closer with Republicans over the years, and see both him and his policies as impossible obstacles to peace, so it’s seriously unlikely they’re doing it for his benefit. I’m sure it’s partly to help restore a sense of security in a traumatized Israeli public but it’s probably primarily messaging for others in the region. They don’t want to give the impression that there’s any daylight between the US and Israel so Iran/Syria/Hezbollah won’t get the idea that it’s worth gambling that the US won’t act if they attack. Especially if Hezbollah decides to go to war, everything will become exponentially worse for everyone involved, including the Palestinians.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            I think they’ve been very consistent and deliberate on their messaging. They don’t want people in the state department to give official statement about de-escalation, but Biden and Blinken are still making those statements themselves, and they’re reportedly pressuring Israel privately too.

            It makes sense. I don’t think there’s a more fraught topic than this. You want to control your messaging around de-escalation to word it correctly, and it’s best for Biden and Blinken to handle that directly.

            Geopolitically, it has to remain clear that the US will keep its word and help Israel. And I think even the sharpest US critic would agree the US presence is a powerful deterrent against Iran and company pulling shit – and if they do, the US will need to react quickly. Iran is behind all this shit, no one should take issue with telling them to shut it.

    • revelrous@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, was listening to BBC this morning -Tim Franks interviewing Israeli intelligence about allowing fuel through to get water pumps going again. It was very clear the answer was no, but they refused to say so directly. The interviewee became hostile and kept going on about how hamas uses these people as human shields. … Is the west supposed to think dying of thirst the more humanitarian option? Is that what they’re going for? jfc

      • hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.questEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Someone said the pipes are too fucked by the bombing and TBH that makes sense. But assuming they’re ok, can you even get water pumps going again safely?

        I’ve heard that pipes always leak and you need to keep constant pressure in the lines so the leak is out into the soil instead of losing pressure and letting the dirt and bacteria leak back into the water supply.

        I suppose dirty water can be boiled and is better than water with heavy metals… Anybody with any actual experience wanna speak up about this?

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPEnglish
      151·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is they’d need Israeli cooperation to ensure the area Gaza-side would be safe from bombardment.

      • stevehobbes@lemm.eeEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        Do you have a source for this? Everything I’ve read has stated that that border is controlled by Egypt and Hamas.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    51·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    Cairo says the Rafah crossing, a potentially vital opening for desperately-needed supplies into the Israeli-besieged Palestinian enclave, is not officially closed but is inoperable due to Israeli air strikes on the Gaza side.

    As Israel’s bombardment and siege of Gaza has intensified, the territory’s 2.3 million residents have been left without power, pushing health and water services to the brink of collapse, with fuel for hospital generators running low.

    “There is an urgent need to alleviate the suffering of Palestinian civilians in Gaza,” Egypt’s Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry told reporters, adding that talks with Israel had not been fruitful.

    Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have been displaced within Gaza, with some taking cars and suitcases south towards the Rafah crossing but others heading back north after failing to find refuge.

    Like others, Egypt has spoken out against any mass exodus of Gaza residents, reflecting deep Arab fears that the latest war could spark a new wave of permanent displacement for Palestinians from lands where they have sought to build a state.

    Early on Monday, two Egyptian security sources had told Reuters a temporary ceasefire in southern Gaza to last several hours had been agreed to facilitate aid and evacuations at Rafah.

    The original article contains 548 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!