I see you point, but I also disagree, but I also somewhat agree.

“AI” as it is today, is a cancer.

However, generative algorithms could have its place as tools for different purposes.

For interactive entertainment. In things like video games, where you get to actually talk with an NPC in a role playing sense (in a speech to text and then get a response in a text to speech fashion).

Or, as a way to generate concepts to help illustrate a point. I draw worse than most kindergarten children, and could not draw a concept of what I’m trying to explain if my life depended on it. And while I could try and explain the same thing over and over until the person gets it, I find a picture generator able to understand me quicker/better and then able to generate a picture for those I’m speaking with.

But there are many problems with “AI” today, one of which is that it’s not actually “Artificial Intelligence”. It uses a ridiculous amount of energy, to do statistical calculations on a massive scale. Just so that in can output something that has a “high” probability of being coherent and that also answers the question/prompt (with higher focus on the former, rather than the latter).

There is also the fact that the data it was “trained” on, in most cases are stolen and in a way that causes/caused disruption to services providing the data they steal (or in Metas case, where the logic is: “We didn’t share the stolen data, so it’s not theft”). And, while I have do have my own not so popular views on copyright, I still see it as stealing.

tl;dr “AI” is a fucking cancer, but the genre of technology might have potential