I didn’t even know there was a premiere in London on Wednesday, but there we have it.

Highlights: the person who saw the movie described it as “fun,” “silly,” and “Guardians of the Galaxy meets Fifth Element meets Mission: Impossible”.

There’s also a full, recorded-from-the-audience Q&A with Michelle Yeoh and Robert Kazinsky.

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    the person who saw the movie described it as “fun,” “silly,” and “Guardians of the Galaxy meets Fifth Element meets Mission: Impossible”.

    I have a feeling I’m gonna be like “This was a good sci fi movie, but should it have been a Trek movie?”

    • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Of the previous Trek movies, we have:

      A deliberately ponderous sci-fi epic

      A submarine story fueled by revenge

      A crew who risks everything to save one friend

      A reunion special with a “save the whales” message front and center

      An ego project with ambition

      A political/spy thriller

      A crossover for the fans

      A zombie movie

      A long episode of TNG

      The second movie again but worse

      A reboot with plot holes

      A misunderstood action flick

      A Fast & Furious movie

      So how is this “not Trek” while all of those are Trek?

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Star Trek has certainly never shied away from “fun and silly” before. I think it’s good to have different flavours available.

      As long as I enjoy this thing, it should be enough for me.