• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    In “who left their bag here”'s case, the gender of the person is not known because their identity isn’t known, so it doesn’t feel strange to use (for us old farts). It can take some effort to retrain your brain to use “they” when it’s a single person whose identity is known (speaking from experience as a Gen Xer).

    Or the person might just be a transphobic asshole. But I like to think that most just need to educate themselves on using pronouns correctly.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I mean, I’m mid 30s, and it took me a long time to internalize “he, she, they” rather than “he, she, it”. It’s just how they were used when I was growing up. Fortunately, I’ve had the opportunity to learn and grow. At the end of the day, just speak with respect and make sure you listen as much as, or more than, speak.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I agree. It’s hard to put myself back in the old mindset (and I was definitely not supportive of this type of thing back in pre-2014) but I really do think I used to use “his or her” more often than “their”, or at least in more formal settings.

        I remember on Mark Rosewater’s Tumblr blog he ran a Q&A (he is the lead designer of Magic: The Gathering). Someone was asking about cards using “his or her” instead of “their” because not everyone uses he/she pronouns. His response was basically that the reason they did that was because they used the Chicago style guide and it said to use “his or her” when referring to a single person of unknown gender. Basically he said that he understood players have different genders, but it was just a style thing, and that the rules even said something about “his or her” referring to the player (regardless of gender). Since then, I believe Magic cards now use “their”, so it’s possible Chicago’s style guide changed (or at least Wizards’ policy did).

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      One thing that might help it feel less strange is realising that you already use a grammatically plural pronoun to refer to individuals all the time: the word “you”. It’s always “you are tall”, not “you is tall”, same as “we” or “they” instead of “he” or “she”. This is because it was historically plural, and “thou” was the singular. Over time we started using the plural to be more polite, and then eventually always using it.

      • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m joining in the “this blew my mind” sentiment and just want to say thanks for sharing this tidbit of info.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        “Thou is tall” sounds weird though.

        you already use a grammatically plural pronoun to refer to individuals all the time: the word “you”. It’s always “you are tall”,

        This made my brain short circuit lol. Can’t believe I never noticed.

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          That’s because “is” is the third person conjugation of Be, not the second. Of course it sounds weird.

          “Thou are”, and the actually correct “thou art” both feel much more natural.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It only feels strange because of how it’s been used previously in my lifetime, not from historical usage. But as you’ve shown, language changes over time, and not having a singular neutral pronoun has proven to be a big omission in English (since “they” has only traditionally been used that way in certain limited cases). If it was good enough for “you,” it’s good enough for “they!”

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah it can take a while to get used to, especially if you knew the person before they changed their pronouns. But the point is it isnt incompatible with our language at all. I think the last panel would be better if it showed the (transphobic) guy and another person and he says “this activist said the craziest thing to me today” and then the second person says “oh yeah, what’d THEY say” because then the ‘they’ pronoun would be directly referring to the person who wanted to be called ‘they’ in the first place.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh yeah it took me a while to default to ‘they’ instead of ‘he/she’ lol
      Sometimes I still mess up and assume, and sometimes I say ‘they’ when I don’t mean to also. Brains are weird.

    • fjordbasa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not complaining or calling it out but I’ve seen the words in the 2nd applied to sooo many different comics. I think that’s actually kind of great that it’s so flexible 😆

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember as a kid the teachers were desperately trying to make “he or she” a thing and told us the singular “they” would never be acceptable.

    I’m personally glad that movement failed.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      looking back, some of my educators were monumentally stupid

      OVERSHARING TIME

      My body doesn’t burp; when I drink something carbonated I have to physically gag myself with something to get the air out. When I was a kid I didn’t know this and would get pain in my stomach and didn’t understand why.

      Coke with my lunch two days in a row resulted in trips to my home room teacher to ask to see the nurse, or go home. My home room teacher crossed her arms and said, “this is the second day in a row you’ve done this to us,” and lectured me about trying to get out of class. I had no way of proving that I was actually in pain. I was angry and scared and couldn’t do anything about it. Do not give me the keys to the time machine or there will be violence.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had a math teacher that was there to coach football… instead of the normal method for balancing equations and such he’d insist you use his wonky play call diagrams.

        Which made all the other algebra and trig teachers have re-teach kids coming out of his last class.

        Dude was a stereotypical jock that was going to give one of his athletes a free pass for stuffing a friend of mine into a locker. At least until i stuffed the tight end in his locker, instead.

        So. How about this. We swap the keys and go all strangers on a train?

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had this exact same problem growing up. When I started drinking excessive amounts of beer the pressure became enough to break through, and I finally started burping. That somehow fixed my body completely, and I’ve been able to burp normally ever since, but my God I’ll never forget the pain of being unable to burp. Literally the worst pain of my life

          • JellyfishGalaxy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Hey I remember a Hank Green video about this. I suffer from time to time with not being able to burp either, so I tried to remember this. Basically, botox injections are found to help for not burping, I think a specific variety, where a muscle is not working right. I think it’s more in the testing phase, but maybe, you too could burp someday!

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I learned English at school and the first time I encountered singular they was when my teacher explained it to us. Sometimes non native speakers are less prescriptive than native speakers

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No, it’s just been a thing forever, and will always be thing. Those teachers, if they ever existed which I doubt, were just dumb fucks from Dumbfuckistan.

  • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone correct me, but “you” was originally plural. The correct way to address a singular person is “thou”.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also singular they is older than singular you. So any idiots who complain that “they” should only be plural should only be using thou/thee for second person singular.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Other commenters have already covered the you/thou thing, so to cover the printing press bit: that did happen, but with a different word. “Ye” as in “Ye Olde Village Inn” is the one. The “ye” here is “the”, and it was pronounced as “the” too. It would have been spelled “þe” before, and in blackletter style (𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔰 𝔰𝔱𝔶𝔩𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔩𝔢𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔦𝔫𝔤), “y” and “þ” looked awfully similar. If your press came from a country that didn’t use the thorn - and many presses in Europe did - and therefore didn’t have that character available, then you’d just use the y since they were close enough anyway

        A similar thing happened with the letter yogh (ȝ) in Scotland. It wasn’t in most presses, but it looks close enough to a z, so just use a z, and now the name “Menzies” is spelled that way despite being pronounced “ming-iss”

        That this “ye” is spelled the same way as the second person plural subject pronoun “ye” is a total coincidence

        • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Stop. You are making some of the senseless things in English make sense. How I’m I supposed to feel superior because my first language is read the way it is written? 😩

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yesn’t. Actually no.

        The singular was thou for subject and thee for object and the plural was ye/you. In formal speech the plural was used and the subject pronoun was replaced by the object but I can’t tell you in which order.

        The þ-thing didn’t effect the pronoun but some surnames and the article. I think some pubs have names like “ye old”. They used to be “þe(=the) old” and have nothing to do with þe old pronoun, even tho it is written the same.

          • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Man Christmas dinner is gonna rock this year. Just like my mom will play dumb and look confused that I used “they” as a singular, I’m going to play dumb and look confused when she says “you”. I see no downsides.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah. And Y'all also used to be plural. Now it can be singular and we use All Y'all to clarify when we need people to know we mean plural. Language is bonkers.

      • Hexarei@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I have never heard y’all used singular, growing up in the American South. Instead, as I understand it:

        • Y’all: You all, referring to a group of people (Can potentially be a subset of a larger group, e.g. talking to one couple at the table among a group of friends). “When are y’all having the wedding again?”

        • All y’all: shorthand for “all of y’all” Explicitly referring to “all of the members of the group in question”, requiring that at least one member of said group is being addressed by the speaker. The difference is there are no exceptions (apart from exaggeration) “Ain’t a single one of you innocent, all y’all had a hand in this” or “All y’all need to put on your seatbelts, I ain’t going to jail for any of y’all’s comfort”.

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Roses are red Violets are blue The singular “they” Pre-dates singular “you”

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thou shalt use proper pronouns and not be lazy recycling plural pronouns in the singular. What next, are thou planing to use a singular “we” like inbred royalty?

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        By chance I actually do come from an area that uses it! Although it’s more of a “yiz” here

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The singular “they” Pre-dates singular “you”

      The same way rights were ore-dated by no rights?

      ‘older’ is not always ‘better’. Make your point, but don’t hinge it on a false comparison.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The point isn’t to say that the singular they is somehow better than the singular you, it’s to point out that it is not a modern invention. People that dislike usage of the singular they often argue that it is an unnatural change being forced upon the language, when in fact it has been in use for so long that it was used by Shakespeare

  • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    When I started interacting with a non-binary person more often, the only reflexive pronoun that came to mind was ‘themselves.’ As in, “They bought themselves a pair of socks for their birthday.” It felt a bit awkward since I couldn’t shake the plural association in my head, but I still used it to be respectful.

    Then I remembered that the word ‘themself’ exists and I felt stupid.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s something I wonder about as a non native speaker: it’s singular they but verbs are still plural (they are, not *they is, they comes). Maybe this will change some day, maybe not. Singular s might die out anyway or maybe because of singular they.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Calling people what they ask to be called just doesn’t have to be this difficult.

    And yes, his royal lordship Starn, the majestic, that goes for you, too. It’s fine. We’re cool with your chosen name. And I admit, the opera cape absolutely works for you.

    And I don’t need to know what genitalia most other people are rocking. That’s none of my business, unless we’re really into each-other, in a very intimate way.

    It takes all my willpower not to be get pretty inappropriate every time a government form asks my birth sex:

    “Oh! We just met at this office of motor vehicles…I didn’t know you felt that way about me! This is so much to process. I admit there’s a mutual attraction. Of course I feel it too. I’m delighted that you had a special form made up to ask! I’m flattered! Want to grab dinner, and see where this goes?”

    • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Calling people what they ask to be called just doesn’t have to be this difficult.

      We in fact do it all the time. It’s just people have gotten used to using names. But it’s not like you were born with a Dave chromosome. Your parents decided to call you Dave, so in the end it’s also just a made up name/sound.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Calling people what they ask to be called just doesn’t have to be this difficult.

      Yeah, I don’t really understand why people get so upset about Drag specifically, like it’s not that hard once you figure it out.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So you’re going to refer to John by John’s name exclusively? Sounds a bit awkward, but okay.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m tired of calling John, John, every time I refer to Join, but I wasn’t paying attention to John’s pronouns, so now I’m stuck until I have a chance to ask John, when I next see John.

        Source: I’ve done this, actually. I hope I was more subtle.

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Remember when we just conversed like human beings and didn’t have all this convoluted nonsense about worrying over pronouns?

          If the person is called John, 99.9% of the time, you know what the pronouns would be, because not everyone is terminally online.

          • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            because not everyone is terminally online.

            LGBT people exist irl too, you’d be surprised how many there are once you get to know them. People you never would’ve thought were lgbt you can now recognize. I’m from Florida which is pretty conservative and I know 5+ trans people (including non-binary).

            They’re pretty cool too! I have a trans guy friend who will absolutely LOVE to talk about how cars work and fishing spots given the chance. He taught me how to change the oil on my car. I’m hoping to get him a blahaj for Christmas :)

            • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              The “terminally online” aspect is the obsession with pronouns, which doesn’t seem to exist in reality.

              I know quite a few LGBT people and even work with someone who is trans. None of them have ever once mentioned anything about pronouns. Because we just conversed like normal people.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I get irked when someone says “he or she,” especially repeatedly, because the singular “they” is so much easier to hear and read.

  • Vipsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    In Finnish language there are no gender specific pronouns only gender neutral one hän/hänen.

    They/them still sounds weird to use even if I know it can be used to refer single person. When talking or writing fast I’ll still often accidentally default to using he/him even for females which I then have to correct.

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In my language everything little word is gendered so everything you talk about is bound by it. It’s extremely confusing thinking or understanding how to describe something in terms “non-gendered”.

      I really am supportive of all the changes needed in the world, but the use of “they” is very confusing in a singular form for people who don’t have it as first language and concepts and everything was learned by mapping stuff to other language, so please invent some word for it and go with it. It’s already strange and always difficult understanding the usage of “you” in singular vs plural and formal or not speech.

      I really wish my language also had gender neutral pronouns, it just sound so much simpler and better.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        please invent some word for it and go with it

        There is are more than one word. It’s going to take quite some time until agreement on the use will distill and become accepted, though.

  • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dear native English speakers, would you mind inventing a new word either for gender-neutral third-person singular pronoun, or one for what “they” mean to foreign English speakers since you are so insisted in differing its meaning from the text books you shipped us decades ago?

    English is so inconsistent at this point. Only the third-person pronouns have gender in singular form, the plural form has no gender and now you are telling us the gender-less form can be singular now? How confusing!

    English is widespread partly because it has simple alphabet and relatively easy grammar. I don’t mind someone being in LGBT+ group at all, but could you please don’t mess with the language?

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Others have addressed some of your other points, but

      would you mind inventing a new word either for gender-neutral third-person singular pronoun, or one for what “they” mean to foreign English speakers

      We actually have that. Xe / Xem / Xyrs. It isn’t very widely used though, and is generally considered a neo pronoun.

      Honestly I don’t really expect it to get mainstream use anytime soon, in part because people are already accused to the singular They / Them / Theirs (except for when a nonbinary person asks to be refered to as such).

    • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      English is so inconsistent at this point.

      At this point? At this very point, specifically due to the historically valid usage of one gender neutral pronoun? Now is the time that it’s finally become an inconsistent language? Singular “they” is the thing that has pushed English over the edge from logical and sensical to arbitrary and confusing? Of all the foibles and quirks, this is the one that is simply unforgivable and must be changed?

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I didn’t say anything you said.

        I think a more sensible way to include LGBT+ group is to just make “she/her” obsolete. We are all “he/him”, and we are “they/them” when in a group. Way cleaner than this, excuse me, shit that we foreign English speakers have to adjust to for every few years.

        • belastend@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Mate, english is my second language too and this is not that confusing.

          Singular they/them has been here for hundreds of years and using it as a gender neutral alternative to she/her and he/him isnt shit, its part of the english language.

        • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          We agree. We make he/him obsolete and we’re all she/her, as there are more female people on the planet, so less people have to adapt

          • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            “he/him” probably isn’t he/him in their non-gendered language. In some languages there’s no he or she, there’s only a pronoun that means “that person”

            Armenian, Persian, Tagalog, Finnish, Georgian, Turkish, Swahili &c

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              That’s true, but you can’t help but notice that when people coming from this background are taught English, they are usually taught that ‘male’ pronouns are the default.

              If anything, I would support the removal of ‘he/him’ for all the backlash it will generate.

              • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 minutes ago

                in france “they” invented “iel”, a gender neutral pronoun, to replace “il” and “elle”. Young people (some?) adopted it rapidly and were using it naturally but the state banned the use of “inclusive language” on all official communications (which includes schools)

                i remember thinking that inventing a new pronoun, like they did, was a better solution than choosing one of the two as gender neutral

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      As the comic shows, “they” (“their,” in this case) was already used as a singular when the gender was unknown. The only change is it’s now also used if the person’s gender is known and isn’t “he” or “she.”

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    These people don’t care if it’s grammatically correct. They just don’t like trans people.

  • Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok, hear me out, super supportive, but I had an issue when a friend’s husband wanted me to use “their.”

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Well… that is entirely a you problem. You should do a little soul searching to figure out why it is so difficult for you to pay someone dear to someone you call a friend the bare minimum amount of respect.

      Would you be upset if your friends constantly misgendered you, then acted like you were the asshole because you took issue with it?

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So you’re not, in fact, “super supportive” at all then, are you, and are not, in fact, worth hearing out… 🙄

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t use it then.

      The only time you would ever need to use someone’s pronouns is when they’re not part of the conversation anyway.

      I couldn’t care less what people refer to me as if I’m not there.

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        “I was with Dan the other day. They forgot their keys at home. They said they had to go back to get them.”

        Literally not hard at all?

        • rah@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          “I was with Dan (they/them) and Steve the other day. They hadn’t brought a poster they needed and went back to the car to get it.”

          This demonstrates the semantic problem with using “they” as a pronoun: it isn’t clear who went back to the car, (1) just Dan or (2) both Dan and Steve. Nor is it clear who needed the poster and who hadn’t brought it.

          • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            If you’re with Dan (they/them) and Dan (he/him), you would also have the problem when saying

            “I was with Dan and Dan the other day. Dan hadn’t brought the poster, so Dan went back to the car to get it.”

            So to avoud confusion, people should not be allowed to be called Dan anymore. In fact everyone gets a UUID so there is no more confusion.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It’s equally unclear if both Dan and Steve use “he”, it’s just the the options are “Dan / Steve” instead of “Dan / Dan and Steve”

            • rah@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              I don’t understand what you’re trying to express. I can’t make sense of what you’ve written.

              • Skua@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                If the Dan in your example used he/him pronouns and so did Steve, then it is equally unclear

                “I was with Dan (he/him) and Steve (he/him) the other day. He hadn’t brought a poster they needed and went back to the car to get it.”

                There’s no way to know whether the “he” is Dan or Steve. The they/them pronoun isn’t the problem in your example, the structure of the sentence is.

          • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            You’re going out of your way to create a problem that doesn’t exist. Just Dan? Say Dan went back to the car. Both Dan and Steve? Say they both went back to the car.

            If you just don’t respect people’s identity then admit you’re bigoted instead of hiding behind faulty logic.

            • rah@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              You’re going out of your way to create a problem that doesn’t exist.

              The problem does exist, that’s why you’re making suggestions about how to work around the problem. I’ve been confused before by people using “they” as a pronoun in exactly this sense. I’m not going out of my way to create a problem, it’s a problem that I’ve experienced IRL. Please don’t try to invalidate my experience.

              If you just don’t respect people’s identity then admit you’re bigoted instead of hiding behind faulty logic.

              You’re jump to conclusions.

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only time you would ever need to use someone’s pronouns is when they’re not part of the conversation anyway.

        no? it would be weird to use in a one-on-one conversation, true. but it is fairly common to use the third person pronoun of someone during a group conversation, even while they are there

        • rah@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          it is fairly common to use the third person pronoun of someone during a group conversation, even while they are there

          But is improper to do so. The proper way to refer to a person who is present is by using their name.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            You don’t use the person’s name every time when you’re talking about them in their presence. If I’m with my friends Mark and Fergus, and I’m telling Mark a story about something that happened to me and Fergus earlier that day, I’m going to use “he” or “his” to refer to Fergus a lot.

            “Can’t believe how close we came to an accident on the way here. We were walking past a building with some scaffolding on it, and a brick just about hit me on the head. Fergus was looking up at the site anyway because his company is advertising on the site, so he saw it fall and stopped me just on time.”

            • rah@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              You don’t use the person’s name every time when you’re talking about them in their presence.

              Those who appreciate polite behaviour do.

              • Skua@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                “Can’t believe how close we came to an accident on the way here. We were walking past a building with some scaffolding on it, and a brick just about hit me on the head. Fergus was looking up at the site anyway because Fergus’s company is advertising on the site, so Fergus saw it fall and stopped me just on time.”

                Nobody talks like this

          • kinsnik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            maybe i have never been in proper situations, then, because in my experience, people will use pronouns or names indistinctly

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t do this, and growing up was taught that it was rude to refer to someone by anything other than their name in a group conversation.