Not really much to do here, but it is good to know. Practically speaking, running Rust in Lambda is exactly the same as it has been for a few years. Only difference is they don’t recommend against it in production. Same runtime, same library.
Not really much to do here, but it is good to know. Practically speaking, running Rust in Lambda is exactly the same as it has been for a few years. Only difference is they don’t recommend against it in production. Same runtime, same library.


If one really wants perfect, they should read Periodic cooking of eggs from the journal Nature earlier this year. Everybody that has implemented it, claims it works great.
For the periodic method, scientists alternated submerging the eggs for two minutes in boiling water at 100 C (212 F) and lukewarm water at 30 C (86 F). This cycle was repeated eight times for 32 minutes.
— from: Scientists developed a new method for the perfect boiled egg, and you can test it at home
And how would you feel if it were $4?


deleted by creator


Wow! WTF? Parents being involved seems the minimum. The way I see it, if the school took no action and the parents were intentionally not told, the kid got off easy without a full blown asswhoopin’.
Yeah, well you know uhh, that’s just like my opinion, man. And without pricing it is hard to say if under or over powered. But I think it is thoughtfully designed. Looks like it is well-cooled, expandable storage, programmable light strip, and you can install whatever you want in it.


I thought the GabeCube was even better.
Valve crushed it out of the park. Great hardware and really well presented; beautiful and succinct.


How will we request thoughts? Will we be left with only prayers? Noooo!
Pretty on the nose. It shouldn’t be that easy.
Traitors


How will you use the machine without applications?
I’m a big fan of keepachangelog. The only automation I recommend is that this is read from tag to tag and used as nice releases. But a human writing the changelog directly in the “Unreleased” section will always produce the most useful changelog.


Again, not defending her, but what? Just because she was being reckless, doesn’t mean running over a person was intentional. That is why one would get charged with something like manslaughter rather than murder. Or maybe she was saying “I’m about to run this guy over. Watch this.” But that wasn’t in the story.


I think it is a bad thing no matter what. Sounds like it was an accident, so even if it was Peter Theil, that woman has to live with that.
Just want to clarify, what she did was not okay on any level. Phones in the console; eyes on the road people. But it is still a bad day when you realize you took somebody’s life because you were irresponsible. At least, I assume for most people.


That seems nonsequitur and doesn’t address either point.


Okay. You must realize it is weird to use the term “development team” to describe a one person side project. Also, are you willing to disclose to what extent and which models were used to create this project?


Forgive me if I sound negative, but when you say team… what do you mean? Seems like one person with a few commits. Not that it isn’t a very serious attempt at tackling a massive challenge; I’m just curious. Looks a bit like a vibe coded attempt at solving a few things you don’t like about Java. And hey, more power to you.


We must be on like volume 73 by now.
You’re probably correct that there are other methods for perfect eggs, but I believe that is a bit reductive. Boiling first then reducing the temperature, while similar, is definitely not the same as periodic temperature change, aside from it adding the same total energy to the system. But the rate that energy is added is the critical variable.
Don’t get me wrong, your method is good, but I don’t think the method in the paper only has the advantages you list. The periodic temperature change is important, and they detail precisely why that is.
Having said all that, I’m certainly not doing this. I’m all about easy and don’t need eggs to be a certain way. I just thought it was neat.