• 125 Posts
  • 1.63K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 27th, 2023

help-circle


  • Lol no one in here on Lemmy knows what poverty even is. Most of you are richer than 97% of the whole freaking planet

    Motherfucker, no one here earns 3 or less USD per month.

    Nor do they have to go into a kilometers long line after toiling from work, just to get the lowest quality possible rations of food, water or gas, and not even knowing if you will get your allotted size/amount portion.

    Hell I don’t even think any of you can even conceive what is like to be without power (or sugar!) for months on end.

    Remote work? Fuck off

    Heating and cooling? Give me a fucking break

    Coffee? Kindly sod off

    Healthcare? How cute

    No, your diet is not poverty, its a full on mental disorder.









  • Ah yes the famous learning curve of having to READ the INSTRUCTION BOOKLET of the things you buy

    Land sakes ahead, HOW WILL WE MANAGE TO COPE WITH IT ALL

    The worst this is that it’s not even a READING thing.

    Its a CARING thing.

    God-damn, it’s your fucking baby. You wanted it? you should have turned since conception into a linear algebra organic machine, devoted solely to calculating solutions for MIGHT DIE scenarios for your baby, applying n dimensional matrices to explore possibility space

    Within the first few years, you should have been able to calculate most obvious scenarios (choking hazards, sand pits, piranhas, etc)

    That frees up time to calculate the utmost edge cases ( wormhole traveling, memetic incursions, local brane collapse, and so on)

    If you are smart about it, you can find an optimal stock selection strategy algorithm within P-Space

    You should print the output in binary tho










  • I can only say that once I started studying physics, QM seemed crazy too. I won’t even go into the astrophysics patchwork that is the ∆CDM models, that’s bonkers. Even the CMBR looks like it’s assuming a lot of things to me, and lately it’s been taking a beating with new findings.

    There is bunch of things people say or do that are crazy or astonishing for you without context. Id suggest you to try not dismissing those things with a thought if you really want to understand them.

    The claim of no factual evidence begs the question of what is factual evidence for the reader. Also self explanatory within the context of the book we are discussing.

    As for the question of knowing what God thinks or wants, it’s self explanatory, given that we are dealing in a discussion within the context of a book that, presumably, tries to explain that to readers.

    Beyond the advice, you are obviously allowed to think anything about anyone.