Yeah we have reached the end of your capabilities go keep repeating the same things until infinity like a good little bot, I won’t be here.

You accuse other news sources of being zionist propaganda and then show me an article who quotes pro-Hamas scholars. But anyway I will humor you.

The only thing this article probably accurately portrays is how Hamas originated, not how it evolved. This article can only reliably refute that Israel did not create Hamas, which also is not really my claim or the majority of wikipedia article’s claim (although it does cite interviews from some Israeli officials claiming this, that is not really any proof). Empowering is not the same thing as creating. Somehow this article glosses over some of the more tangible evidences that this claim is built upon like how the Israeli military doing nothing in the 1980 riots despite them being quite trigger happy at the slightest commotion. Israel quite often stood by when the fundamentalists battled more pro-secular wings which under normal stances would be something contrary to a state which wants to “root out Islamism” from their neighborhood.

The article also says that Zionists are spreading these rumors as a cudgel to keep Nethanyahu in check, which funny enough only makes sense if there is some truth behind it so that it can actually be used as blackmail. So that makes me believe that Israeli state supported Hamas even more. You can also have a look at this related article if you are actually reading anything I am putting here

That article quoting pro-hamas scholars as evidence is the same as me quoting a nationalist Israel news article as a source. Atleast I try to keep my sources varied. Also I am sure you can see the circular logic in calling the act of accusing Israel of actually funding instability in the region and using that as a casus belli for genocide a “Hasbara”. How does that even help Israel? Israel has been using all its PR apparatus to convince the rest of the world that they are the “good guys”, this goes completely against that.

That I am on board with in theory though in practice I find it hard to be realized in a short time after decades of zionist propaganda against Islam. So if we are ever going to go there, we need to start by holding zionists and state of Israel heavily accountable for what they did and still are doing.

Goodbye

Sorry before you go, here is a fact about your favourite independence fighters

The Israeli government has been involved in assisting or empowering the Palestinian political and military organization Hamas at various points in its history.[a] This support continued during and in spite of active military hostilities between the two sides.

But ofcourse for you wikipedia is also a Zionist organization (that somehow holds the Israeli state accountable for double dealing and genocide but where you go logic does not seem to follow so that is ok).

One, not all of them are opinion pieces,

Two, even after being able to list tens of articles I specifically said this still DOESN’T mean this is their editorial stance point despite you claiming that their editorial stance point is pro zionism only after showing two articles. Something doesn’t add up here. Also fuck Hamas by the way, I don’t know if that article reflects anything truthful but Hamas is a terrorist organization and just like genocide, it should be condemned. I understand the urge to hurt the other side after decades of opression and genocide but still won’t side with killing civilians as a rational person. I can’t condemn them for all this. If I saw my kid get blown to pieces I would probably join them too. But it doesn’t mean I see them as the solution to this ongoing genocide or that I would expect a mainstream media to completely side with them. It is unrealistic and unreasonable. Not to mention Hamas was a actually supported by Israel for a long time so supporting Hamas is kind of cyclic. They are likely infiltrated by Israeli agents (of Palestinian origin) and being used as puppets in this opression to create casus belli for Israel.

Three, being able to release REGULAR opinion pieces about genocide and actual articles about the extent of destruction going in in Gaza is much more than any mainstream western media is doing right now. And I believe this has had positive impact on regular pro palestine marches in the UK some of which reached to almost half a million in attendance. Stop with this “anyone who doesn’t do stuff exactly the way I want them to is a Zionist” rhetoric, doesn’t help you, doesn’t help anyone and makes you look like a bot.

Yeah that cartoon sucks and conflates zionism with Jews which is stupid (and degrading for non zionist Jews actually). But when it comes to calling Gazan genocide a genocide it is still Zionists’ tender spot. They are suing academicians, journalists all over the world for less so I still wouldn’t call it a stronghold. I wouldn’t even call it an editorial stance (for the same reason I don’t call anti zionism their editorial stance because they publish articles calling the genocide a genocide). Here are some examples from me

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/06/we-are-witnessing-the-final-stage-of-genocide-in-gaza

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/21/omer-bartov-israel-zionism-genocide

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/01/leaked-gaza-riviera-plan-dismissed-as-insane-attempt-to-cover-ethnic-cleansing

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/oct/01/new-google-maps-images-reveal-massive-scale-of-devastation-in-gaza

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/07/israeli-minister-reveals-plan-to-force-population-of-gaza-into-camp-on-ruins-of-rafah

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/23/israel-gaza-war-crimes-guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/09/the-gaza-family-torn-apart-by-idf-snipers-from-chicago-and-munich

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/apr/07/ten-britons-accused-of-committing-war-crimes-while-fighting-for-israel-in-gaza

I also I don’t expect them to debate the existence of Israel. You may study it historically and conclude that it was a mistake for them to try to force their existence in middle east back then, but the fact of the matter is there is an Israel now. Anything that goes along the lines of “they shouldn’t exist there” is trading one genocide for another one so it would be not only unreasonable to expect a respectable media outlet to defend that position, inhumane too. What is required is harsh accountability for everything that zionists and state of Israel has done in Gaza, a cleansing of world politics from zionist influence and burying their public image into the ground so that at least the next generation doesn’t follow in their footsteps.

Zionist strongholds aren’t known for allowing occasional Liberel dissent, especially when it comes to calling what they do genocide. They are more the “kill now ask questions later” type. But yeah I did see the second article you mentioned, not the first one though. By numbers however I believe anti-zionist articles would far outweight zionist ones. Not that having even one is okay but still if I would call a place zionist den, it would be BBC.

US much?

(and not just for comments this time)

To be fair Guardian was one of the few (maybe only) main stream media outlets that had regular articles on Gaza calling it a genocide/ethnic cleansing/war crime. It wasn’t ofcourse an editorial stand point but they allowed their writers to express this opinion. BBC on the other hand is a different story…

Yeah if anything it quenched the rebellions more than it did the goverment’s opression as people are now more afraid of their lives then they were even before. For the government it was more a handover than a regime change. Thanks Trump for helping government of Iran I guess.

It was Elon Musk, I am 100% sure.

bask in its glory

Don’t forget Temple OS

It is not even a good one. Is this really the most convincing argument the CTO of one of the most aggressive tech companies can come up with? Are these people just facades because with mental skills like this I don’t think they can even run a lemonade stand. What even makes them useful, connections? Willingness to sacrifice their humanity for profit? A never ending obedience to shareholders?

It has already been forked more than 60K times, there is no way linux can recover from this.

Except small local LLMs probably aren’t good enough to carry autonomous tasks correctly (even stuff like Haiku 4.8 from Anthropic makes mistakes quite often) and good luck getting something the size of Opus working in a soda machine. They may not even be able to lay low correctly. But then again these companies have internal models which are atleast couple generations ahead of what is publicly available so maybe they have more efficient smaller ones too? I somehow find it hard to believe but I guess we will see.

Yeah seems pretty person specific, where I looked it says soluble fibers are fine, dairy is bad if you are lactose intolerant, fatty foods are bad during flare ups.

Is this real? If so, wow not even something along the lines of “fair allocation of resources among our users” or sth like that

"Susan, who has ulcerative colitis, said: “On a morning you could have toast, a hard boiled egg, or something in sauce. There was no bacon. For breakfast there was mozzarella and sliced tomatoes. There was no hot bacon or sausage.”

Oh no Mozarella and tomatoes? Atrocious. Funny thing is fatty and processed foods like bacons and sausage are in the avoid list for people for ulcerative colitis (so is dairy for some to be fair but that is more case specific I think).