• azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    So… Cotton/Linen/Wool? The technology is fine, its only downside in most applications is simply cost. Cotton clothes are more comfortable, less stinky, less polluting, and won’t fuse with your skin and disfigure you for life if they accidentally catch on fire. On top of not making microplastics soup every wash cycle.

    If we cared to actually solve the problem of plastics in fast fashion we could ban them, with some exceptions for sportswear and shoes where synthetics have some actually useful uses. Hell, we could even make it an easy transition by gradually pulling back the allowable synthetic content for x years.

    But it would directly kneecap Shein and H&M’s business model so we have to weigh all the pros against that.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Cotton/Linen/Wool

      There’s also Hemp. And Lyocell, which is made from cellulose (Sourced from trees or bamboo).

      And yeah nice fully cotton clothes can be pricey. The upside is that they’re generally much higher quality and very comfy. Annoyingly it is very common for stuff to be labeled “100% cotton” yet still be cotton/poly mix so always check the fabric breakdown on tags or website fine print.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m sure would find equivalent non-polluting alternative materials within a couple of years if we banned all plastics (“synthetic textiles”).
      But only if we actually put the ban in place.
      Otherwise the answer is never.