• BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    5 天前

    This is clearly a indoor Bazar with doors that lock on both ends, they leave them out cause it’s not technically outside and ain’t nobody breaking in to steal some books, shits heavy and probably doesn’t sell for all that much on the black market

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 天前

    Yeah but the vandal does vandalize. In my country there are tons of shitheads who like to see the world burn and destroy someone else property when nobody is around. Like in some neighborhoods in certain cities you can’t have a mini library in your front yard, since a certain type of teenager will ransack it and set the books on fire.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 天前

    We do this at a used book store. It’s books that we don’t think we can sell inside for whatever reason, and we put them on shelves outside. There’s a big awning so they don’t really get rained on unless it’s raining sideways. We sell them for a dime or a quarter, and there’s a slot for overnight drops in case people want to get books at night. Every morning there’s at least a couple of bucks from the previous day/night.

    We donate the proceeds to public radio, and over the years we’ve donated over $100,000.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 天前

        on the basis of semantics

        It’s not semantics when “stealing” results in the loss of the original by the owner while “copying” just results in a new one being created.

        TL;DR: ✨die mad✨

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 天前

            Too bad. Because it’s being redistributed through a third party, you aren’t even stealing a negligible amount of electricity, bandwidth, or CPU time from them. Damn, when you think about it, it’s just not “stealing” in any capacity, is it?

        • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 天前

          That’s a semantic point. The truth is that artists deserve to be paid for their work. Whether you “copy” or “steal”, you’re getting the work without paying the creator. That’s fundamentally shitty behavior.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 天前

            Okay, but I literally just expressed how they’re fundamentally, pragmatically different while you keep reaching for the word “semantics”. You can still disagree that it’s wrong to copy – that’s not what I’m trying to litigage. To call it only semantically different from stealing is asinine.

            • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 天前

              I never said it was only semantically different, only that you were making a semantic argument: namely, citing the semantic distinction between copying and stealing as grounds for one being acceptable and the other not (“stealing” is wrong but I’m “copying”), ignoring that the injustice against the work’s creator is not pragmatically different. Practically speaking, the author is equally robbed whether you “copy” or “steal”; therefore, arguing that copying is not stealing obscures the heart of the matter behind a semantic distinction.

          • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 天前

            Is it stealing if I buy a second hand book? I’m still getting to enjoy the work without paying the author (even if the original person paid). Multiple people can own a physical copy at different times (with the author only getting paid once).

            Just like downloads. I don’t feel bad about downloading stuff that’s out of print. No one is making money from it now anyway, so what harm. If anything, digital copies help to stop these books being lost.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 天前

          I mean that’s literally semantics but whatever, if that’s the definition you’re going with then sure. If you ask me, you breached a contract and got a product out of it anyway, I’d call that stealing. I don’t think scarcity even factors into whether it’s stealing when it’s all about whether it was a legit transaction. Lack of scarcity may help justify it when the distributor is a shithead but it doesn’t make you not a thief.

          -a proud thief, steal your shit, especially from Adobe fuckem

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 天前

        i often buy books on a DRM’d store or a paper copy, but then download the epub to put on my e-ink tablet so i don’t have to deal with the shitty DRM’d app it would be stuck in.

      • CybranM@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 天前

        You don’t deserve the downvotes, you’re right. If everyone used the “iTs NoT sTeAlInG” argument then no digital works would ever be profitable and everyone would lose.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      Piracy is not theft. You have not deprived anyone of something they would otherwise have.

          • theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 天前

            This. As a hillbilly with no access to books growing up, with my education practically stopping at the 4th grade and no stores in sight to purchase books from, I would have never had access to the things I read without piracy.

            I half believe that’s why it’s an issue in the first place.

            I started my reading adventure at 640x480 on windows 98.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 天前

            Maybe. I pirate a shit ton of stuff, a lot of it yeah I would never have bought but a lot of it I would, or at least I would’ve rented. I enjoy crime though

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 天前

              A fraction of what an author makes through selling. And libraries end up selling those books after some time anyway, “ripping off” the author twice.

              I think we all need to realize that there are so many things we do that could be compared to piracy, yet piracy is the one that’s made to look like the worst thing you can do. It really isn’t.

        • brisk@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 天前

          I have a physical book collection worth thousands of dollars. The only party that has profited off me is Elsevier.

            • brisk@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 天前

              Hah. Our textbook market isn’t quite as captured. They run from $50-$350. I have about 100 textbooks and a bit under 200 books total.

          • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 天前

            If I did not have the money to pay for the books or they are too hard for me to find then no loss would have occurred because purchasing was never happening.

            If I did have the money and the books were eaay to find but still pirated then a loss did occur.

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 天前

          One cannot be entitled to castles in the air just because they imagined it.

          edit: if some person spent some effort and got a copy online for free, were they ever considered to be a prospective customer in the first place?

  • ZeldaFreak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 天前

    Here people even “steal” books from public bookcases and sell them.

    For people who aren’t familiar, let me explain: These public bookcases are a weatherproof shelf, old phone booth or something in the streets. The concept is you can take any book and leave any book. There are no written rules and you can keep a book if you like or just read it and put it back. In recent years people started to scan the barcodes and checked what books they can sell. There is a debate going on if people should mark these books or not, so they can’t be sold.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 天前

      Who tf is buying normal books from the local black market in 2025 is my real question here

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 天前

        It’s more of an online market. eBay, Amazon to a certain extent, there’s loads of book specific ones and some that are for used items generally and allow books. And unless marked it’s not the black market at all. I mean obviously the book is stolen, but it’s just entering the used market as opposed to being sold through a fence or whatever

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 天前

        I’m in the UK and these are all over the place, especially in more rural areas, and we’re famed for our lovely weather! 😂

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 天前

        I live in SW Finland on the coast of the Baltic Sea. It’s wet and cold 90% of the year.

        We still have this sort of book exchange in the entrance way to my local shop. A tiny bookshelf/night desk. Not too common though, I can’t think of any others right now.

        But like the weather shouldn’t be the issue, that’s just an engineering problem at that point. I imagine like a glass doored fridge with some dehumidifiers placed inside should probably work in most places to protect books.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 天前

    But what if the thief steals the books not to read them, but just to fill their house with books and make themselves seem erudite and intelligent?

    I’m imagining the most extreme version of this, where a man is living in a house that is a veritable library. Yet, they’re actually illiterate.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 天前

      Sounds like a “truther” or flat earther.

      I was about to describe here a world wherein a flat earther glass through a book to call it out on all the “lies”, then I realised “oh wait, I literally watched a video on that”

      … It was a children’s science book 😂

      https://youtu.be/7WxPyK1ZL_4?t=2m2s

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      That’s common as a backdrop for offices and stuff, they sell books by the pound for that.